User talk:Lhearne: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Improvement on SHEFKHED interval names: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Hi Xenwolf, <br> | : Hi Xenwolf, <br> | ||
: Ok awesome, thanks so much! --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 12:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | : Ok awesome, thanks so much! --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 12:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Improvement on SHEFKHED interval names == | |||
Hey! Are you one of the people involved in creating [[SHEFKHED interval names]]? If so, I would like to talk to you, as I would like to find out the best way to name some intervals, especially for non-meantone settings like 159edo. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:31, 31 January 2021
Fighting with table syntax
Hi Lhearne,
I saw some of your changes on page The 16 most stable triads of 22edo. Let me give you a short hint: add one space ( ) between the leading meta char(s) and the actual cell content, this way also negative numbers will display correctly (plus also eases the orientation for later changes). In the table syntax all the following combinations - when starting a line - have a special meaning: |, !, |-, |+ {|, |}. Hope this helps --Xenwolf (talk) 12:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Improvement on SHEFKHED interval names
Hey! Are you one of the people involved in creating SHEFKHED interval names? If so, I would like to talk to you, as I would like to find out the best way to name some intervals, especially for non-meantone settings like 159edo. --Aura (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)