Talk:Telicity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC) | ::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the | ::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the property of a given EDO which grants the ability, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] (designated as the "telos") without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain, thus resulting in the given prime's interval chain having a sense of completion. | ||
::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of telicity. | ::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of telicity. | ||