Consistency: Difference between revisions

Line 16:

If ''m'' ≥ 0, a chord ''C'' is '''consistent to distance''' ''m'' in ''N''-edo if there exists an approximation ''C' '' of ''C'' in ''N''-edo such that:

# every instance of an interval in C is mapped to the same size in C', and

# no interval within ''C' '' has [[relative error]] 1\(2N(''m''+1)) or more.

# no interval within ''C' '' has [[relative error]] 1/(2(''m''+1)) or more.

"Consistent to distance 0" is equivalent to "consistent".

(The 1\(2N(''m''+1)) threshold is meant to allow stacking ''m'' dyads that occur in the chord without having the sum of the dyads have over 50% relative error. Since "consistent to distance ''m''" conveys the idea that a local neighborhood of the consonant chord in the JI lattice is mapped nicely, an approximation consistent to distance ''m'' would play more nicely in a regular temperament-style [[subgroup]] context.)

(The 1/(2(''m''+1)) threshold is meant to allow stacking ''m'' dyads that occur in the chord without having the sum of the dyads have over 50% relative error. Since "consistent to distance ''m''" conveys the idea that a local neighborhood of the consonant chord in the JI lattice is mapped nicely, an approximation consistent to distance ''m'' would play more nicely in a regular temperament-style [[subgroup]] context.)

For example, 4:5:6:7 is consistent to distance 2 in [[31edo]]. However, 4:5:6:7:11 is only consistent and not to distance 1 because 11/5 is mapped too inaccurately (rel error 26.2%). This shows that 31edo is especially strong in the 2.3.5.7 subgroup and weaker in 2.3.5.7.11.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 If ''m'' ≥ 0, a chord ''C'' is '''consistent to distance''' ''m'' in ''N''-edo if there exists an approximation ''C' '' of ''C'' in ''N''-edo such that:
 # every instance of an interval in C is mapped to the same size in C', and
-# no interval within ''C' '' has [[relative error]] 1\(2N(''m''+1)) or more.
+# no interval within ''C' '' has [[relative error]] 1/(2(''m''+1)) or more.
 "Consistent to distance 0" is equivalent to "consistent".
-(The 1\(2N(''m''+1)) threshold is meant to allow stacking ''m'' dyads that occur in the chord without having the sum of the dyads have over 50% relative error. Since "consistent to distance ''m''" conveys the idea that a local neighborhood of the consonant chord in the JI lattice is mapped nicely, an approximation consistent to distance ''m'' would play more nicely in a regular temperament-style [[subgroup]] context.)
+(The 1/(2(''m''+1)) threshold is meant to allow stacking ''m'' dyads that occur in the chord without having the sum of the dyads have over 50% relative error. Since "consistent to distance ''m''" conveys the idea that a local neighborhood of the consonant chord in the JI lattice is mapped nicely, an approximation consistent to distance ''m'' would play more nicely in a regular temperament-style [[subgroup]] context.)
 For example, 4:5:6:7 is consistent to distance 2 in [[31edo]]. However, 4:5:6:7:11 is only consistent and not to distance 1 because 11/5 is mapped too inaccurately (rel error 26.2%). This shows that 31edo is especially strong in the 2.3.5.7 subgroup and weaker in 2.3.5.7.11.