Consistency: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ja = 一貫性 | | ja = 一貫性 | ||
}} | }} | ||
An [[edo]] represents the q-[[odd limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the q-odd limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. This word can actually be used with any set of odd harmonics: e.g. [[12edo]] is consistent in the no-11's, no 13's 19-odd limit, i.e. the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19. A different formulation: an edo represents a chord C '''consistently''' if there exists an approximation of the chord in the edo such that no interval within the chord has to be off by more than 50% of an edo step. In this formulation, 12edo represents the chord 1:3:5:7:17:19 consistently. | An [[edo]] represents the q-[[odd limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the q-odd limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. This word can actually be used with any set of odd harmonics: e.g. [[12edo]] is consistent in the no-11's, no 13's 19-odd limit, i.e. the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19. A different formulation: an edo represents a chord C '''consistently''' if there exists an approximation of the chord in the edo such that: | ||
# the same interval in C is always mapped to the same size in C', and | |||
# no interval within the chord has to be off by more than 50% of an edo step. | |||
In this formulation, 12edo represents the chord 1:3:5:7:17:19 consistently. | |||
The concept only makes sense for edos and not for non-edo rank-2 (or higher) temperaments, since in these tunings you can get any ratio you want to arbitary accuracy by piling up a lot of generators. | The concept only makes sense for edos and not for non-edo rank-2 (or higher) temperaments, since in these tunings you can get any ratio you want to arbitary accuracy by piling up a lot of generators. | ||
Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
Stated more mathematically, if N-edo is an [[equal division of the octave]], and if for any interval r, N(r) is the best N-edo approximation to r, then N is '''consistent''' with respect to a set of intervals S if for any two intervals a and b in S where ab is also in S, N(ab) = N(a) + N(b). Normally this is considered when S is the set of [[Odd limit|q odd limit intervals]], consisting of everything of the form 2^n u/v, where u and v are odd integers less than or equal to q. N is then said to be ''q limit consistent''. If each interval in the q-limit is mapped to a unique value by N, then it said to be ''uniquely q limit consistent''. | Stated more mathematically, if N-edo is an [[equal division of the octave]], and if for any interval r, N(r) is the best N-edo approximation to r, then N is '''consistent''' with respect to a set of intervals S if for any two intervals a and b in S where ab is also in S, N(ab) = N(a) + N(b). Normally this is considered when S is the set of [[Odd limit|q odd limit intervals]], consisting of everything of the form 2^n u/v, where u and v are odd integers less than or equal to q. N is then said to be ''q limit consistent''. If each interval in the q-limit is mapped to a unique value by N, then it said to be ''uniquely q limit consistent''. | ||
''N''-edo is '''strongly consistent''' with respect to a chord ''C'' if there exists an approximation ''C' '' of ''C'' in ''N''-edo such that no interval within ''C' '' has [[relative error]] 25% or more. (The threshold is meant to allow stacking two dyads ''a'', ''b'' once without having the sum ''a + b'' of the dyads have over 50% relative error; thus a strongly consistent approximation would play more nicely in a regular temperament-style [[subgroup]] context.) | ''N''-edo is '''strongly consistent''' with respect to a chord ''C'' if there exists an approximation ''C' '' of ''C'' in ''N''-edo such that: | ||
# the same interval in C is always mapped to the same size in C', and | |||
# no interval within ''C' '' has [[relative error]] 25% or more. | |||
(The 25% threshold is meant to allow stacking two dyads ''a'', ''b'' once without having the sum ''a + b'' of the dyads have over 50% relative error; thus a strongly consistent approximation would play more nicely in a regular temperament-style [[subgroup]] context.) | |||
The page ''[[Minimal consistent EDOs]]'' shows the smallest edo that is consistent or uniquely consistent in a given odd limit while the page ''[[Consistency levels of small EDOs]]'' shows the largest odd limit that a given edo is consistent or uniquely consistent in. | The page ''[[Minimal consistent EDOs]]'' shows the smallest edo that is consistent or uniquely consistent in a given odd limit while the page ''[[Consistency levels of small EDOs]]'' shows the largest odd limit that a given edo is consistent or uniquely consistent in. |