Talk:Telicity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: I do think that there are both qualitative as well as quantitative aspects to telicity- especially when you apply this to the JND. As to the domain of values and the possible units, those are definitely good questions, though to be fair this portion covers the telicity range of commas and other small music intervals like the JND. I should point out that "telicity" itself seems to exist on a true or false basis for any given type, such as 3-to-2, 5-to-3, 11-to-3, etcetera, while the related "telicity range" denotes the numerical range in which a given type of telicity, as achieved by either the tempering of a given comma, or, as in the case of the JND, the direct mapping to the unison, can potentially be true. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 08:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC) | : I do think that there are both qualitative as well as quantitative aspects to telicity- especially when you apply this to the JND. As to the domain of values and the possible units, those are definitely good questions, though to be fair this portion covers the telicity range of commas and other small music intervals like the JND. I should point out that "telicity" itself seems to exist on a true or false basis for any given type, such as 3-to-2, 5-to-3, 11-to-3, etcetera, while the related "telicity range" denotes the numerical range in which a given type of telicity, as achieved by either the tempering of a given comma, or, as in the case of the JND, the direct mapping to the unison, can potentially be true. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 08:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
: One part of the quantitative aspect of this is particularly clear, the unit for used for the measurement of telicity range represents the number of steps in a given EDO. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 08:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC) | |||