Talk:Functional Just System: Difference between revisions
→Radius of tolerance: new section |
→Radius of tolerance: answer |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Does anybody have a short explanation why [[65/63]] is being used? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC) | Does anybody have a short explanation why [[65/63]] is being used? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I found "the answer" close to the end of [https://misotanni.github.io/fjs/en/crash.html The FJS Crash Course]: | |||
:: ''This number is the mediant of 33/32 and 32/31, being strictly greater than the former and strictly less than the latter. So 33/32 is accepted as a possible formal comma, allowing the representation of 11/8 as a P4 (if this was rejected, the next nearest approximation would be an absurd d5). But at the same time, 32/31 is rejected, disallowing the just as absurd representation of 31/16 as a P8.'' | |||
: I'm not sure I really like it. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC) | |||