Template talk:Infobox ET: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
::::::: OK, I could live with that, as long as all 3 numbers are there in edosteps --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 05:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC) | ::::::: OK, I could live with that, as long as all 3 numbers are there in edosteps --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 05:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::::: In editing all the EDO pages, I came to realize that the cents for the m2 and A1 are very handy. Yes, you can do the math and calculate the cents, but it's really handy to see at a glance how many cents a sharp sign is. Also for large edos, doing the math is too much work. So on second thought, I would only like this proposed format if it also included the cents. Also, this is a bit of a quibble, but "semitone" means half a tone. And in a lot of these edos, it's nowhere near half. So the term semitone is a bit misleading, and IMO better avoided. | |||
I just removed all the disputable parameters. I carefully moved all the data entries to a better spot on the EDO page. Example compositions got moved to "Introductory Materials". Important MOSes got moved to "Rank Two Temperaments". Common uses and subgroups got deleted. I considered working the common uses into the theory section, but they just seemed so arbitrary. Every edo has a thousand uses. I didn't do anything with the intro section. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 07:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Intro sentence on EDO pages == | == Intro sentence on EDO pages == |