User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 480:

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Well, "concordance" (as mentioned in the harmonic entropy article) is one example. Another example can be derived from the fact that 7/5 is a concordant interval, yet, [[10/7]]- 7/5's more discordant [[octave complement]]- is also considered "consonant", but this consonance is clearly of a different variety from "concordance"- I'd term 10/7's type of consonance "inverse concordance", at least until we can think up a better name. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before? Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch class and other pitch classes that are generated by the first pitch class's overtone series and undertone series- it's the kind of consonance that ~~does~~ the ~~most~~ work in establishing tonality. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before? Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch class and other pitch classes that are generated by the first pitch class's overtone series and undertone series- it's the kind of consonance that seems to do the lion's share of the work when it comes to establishing tonality. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Yes, I'm having to invent terminology here, but I'm alluding to stuff that I suspect is very much real in some form or fashion. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]])

@@ Line 480: / Line 480: @@
 :::::::::::::::::::::::::: Well, "concordance" (as mentioned in the harmonic entropy article) is one example.  Another example can be derived from the fact that 7/5 is a concordant interval, yet, [[10/7]]- 7/5's more discordant [[octave complement]]- is also considered "consonant", but this consonance is clearly of a different variety from "concordance"- I'd term 10/7's type of consonance "inverse concordance", at least until we can think up a better name. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
-:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before?  Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch class and other pitch classes that are generated by the first pitch class's overtone series and undertone series- it's the kind of consonance that does the most work in establishing tonality. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Oh, and remember what I was talking about when I mentioned "connectivity" before?  Basically, "connectivity"- for lack of a better term at the moment- is the type of "consonance" that only exists between a given pitch class and other pitch classes that are generated by the first pitch class's overtone series and undertone series- it's the kind of consonance that seems to do the lion's share of the work when it comes to establishing tonality. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::::::::::::::::::: Yes, I'm having to invent terminology here, but I'm alluding to stuff that I suspect is very much real in some form or fashion. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]])