User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 440:

::::::::::::::: Yes, I can understand it. And thank you for the description on the chord example, it is very close to my guess and now is clear. Today, I got another new idea; it happened when I mentioned "playground". I'll postpone this paradiatonic application and first will try to suggest something similar, but closer to the idea of "Playground". This application will accept user's tonal values and put them in a simple yet ready-to use keyboard. This way, you could combine random ideas, try out by playing and listening, and change the repertoires of available tones in seconds. Doesn't it sound interesting? — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Monday 2020 December 7, 02:22 UTC''

:::::::::::::::: The "Playground" idea does sound interesting, though the question remains as to how exactly to program complicated tonal values. On another note, when you say "Yes, I can understand it," is the ~~concept of small rational intervals between the wrong two notes in a scale destabilizing tonality among~~ the ~~things that is~~ clear ~~to you?~~ --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::: The "Playground" idea does sound interesting, though the question remains as to how exactly to program complicated tonal values. On another note, when you say "Yes, I can understand it," what is the "it" you are referring to? Sorry for the massive edit, but I didn't feel like I was being clear. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

::::::::::::: By the way, do you really still use MP3?! It is not just obsolete, it is stone age, with ridiculous quality and compression. Top Web standard is .opus, is supported by everything. Probably, MP3 is alive only due to the existence of the devices like car audio — nothing is so conservative as those weird people designing such devices. :-)

@@ Line 440: / Line 440: @@
 ::::::::::::::: Yes, I can understand it. And thank you for the description on the chord example, it is very close to my guess and now is clear. Today, I got another new idea; it happened when I mentioned "playground". I'll postpone this paradiatonic application and first will try to suggest something similar, but closer to the idea of "Playground". This application will accept user's tonal values and put them in a simple yet ready-to use keyboard. This way, you could combine random ideas, try out by playing and listening, and change the repertoires of available tones in seconds. Doesn't it sound interesting? &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:SAKryukov|SA]],&nbsp;''Monday&nbsp;2020&nbsp;December&nbsp;7,&nbsp;02:22&nbsp;UTC''
-:::::::::::::::: The "Playground" idea does sound interesting, though the question remains as to how exactly to program complicated tonal values.  On another note, when you say "Yes, I can understand it," is the concept of small rational intervals between the wrong two notes in a scale destabilizing tonality among the things that is clear to you? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::::::::: The "Playground" idea does sound interesting, though the question remains as to how exactly to program complicated tonal values.  On another note, when you say "Yes, I can understand it," what is the "it" you are referring to?  Sorry for the massive edit, but I didn't feel like I was being clear. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 ::::::::::::: By the way, do you really still use MP3?! It is not just obsolete, it is stone age, with ridiculous quality and compression. Top Web standard is .opus, is supported by everything. Probably, MP3 is alive only due to the existence of the devices like car audio — nothing is so conservative as those weird people designing such devices. :-)