User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 323:

: Sorry, nothing certain. Even though I'm familiar with many well-known comma names, I did not think enough of the the motivation and the correspondence between the nature of each comma and its naming. Besides, to make your considerations comprehensible, you probably need to explain everything in some definitive order: first, the schema of getting to one or another comma, which intervals or chains come to the comma, in what way, then, you need to present some rationale behind the suggested name, relating the nature (its role, significance, historical facts) and the proposed naming. More generally, I can see some specifically musical communication problems. It is not as trivial as the specific terminology not quite understandable by people from the outside word, no, this is some deficit of communication culture, resembling, say, irregularities of classical chemical nomenclature... — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Tuesday 2020 December 1, 00:24 UTC''

:: I have to admit I don't know what you mean by "schema" here. That said, I can tell you which intervals or chains come to the comma and in what way. I can also give some degree of rational behind the suggested name, relating the nature of the comma and the proposed meaning... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:51, 1 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,012 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:09, 1 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,012 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 323:		Line 323:

	: Sorry, nothing certain. Even though I'm familiar with many well-known comma names, I did not think enough of the the motivation and the correspondence between the nature of each comma and its naming. Besides, to make your considerations comprehensible, you probably need to explain everything in some definitive order: first, the schema of getting to one or another comma, which intervals or chains come to the comma, in what way, then, you need to present some rationale behind the suggested name, relating the nature (its role, significance, historical facts) and the proposed naming. More generally, I can see some specifically musical communication problems. It is not as trivial as the specific terminology not quite understandable by people from the outside word, no, this is some deficit of communication culture, resembling, say, irregularities of classical chemical nomenclature... — [[User:SAKryukov\|SA]], ''Tuesday 2020 December 1, 00:24 UTC''		: Sorry, nothing certain. Even though I'm familiar with many well-known comma names, I did not think enough of the the motivation and the correspondence between the nature of each comma and its naming. Besides, to make your considerations comprehensible, you probably need to explain everything in some definitive order: first, the schema of getting to one or another comma, which intervals or chains come to the comma, in what way, then, you need to present some rationale behind the suggested name, relating the nature (its role, significance, historical facts) and the proposed naming. More generally, I can see some specifically musical communication problems. It is not as trivial as the specific terminology not quite understandable by people from the outside word, no, this is some deficit of communication culture, resembling, say, irregularities of classical chemical nomenclature... — [[User:SAKryukov\|SA]], ''Tuesday 2020 December 1, 00:24 UTC''

			:: I have to admit I don't know what you mean by "schema" here. That said, I can tell you which intervals or chains come to the comma and in what way. I can also give some degree of rational behind the suggested name, relating the nature of the comma and the proposed meaning... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)