Aura (talk | contribs)
24edo Harmony: new section
SAKryukov (talk | contribs)
Line 375: Line 375:


Hey SA, do you think we have the chance to talk about the harmonic possibilities of 24edo in regards to 11/8 and 16/11 now that you have listened to "Folly of a Drunk"?  I mean, judging from the absolute error amounts, I'd say that 24edo approximates 11/8 and 16/11 better than 22edo does... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Hey SA, do you think we have the chance to talk about the harmonic possibilities of 24edo in regards to 11/8 and 16/11 now that you have listened to "Folly of a Drunk"?  I mean, judging from the absolute error amounts, I'd say that 24edo approximates 11/8 and 16/11 better than 22edo does... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
: We can, but I'm going to be somewhat busy, will hardly spend so much time. I'd better need to do some calculations before I'm ready to talk; this is a very fast thing but needs some distraction. First of all, I already admitted that my judgment on this EDO was not based on comprehensive considerations, as I only used the comparisons with "just intonation" in a very narrow sense of this expression, only the well-know system 9/8 5/4 4/3 3/2 5/3 15/8, closely related to the common-practice one. I forgot to notice that my own research aimed to produce some extended sets of intervals renders that judgment obsolete. Based on that criteria, my old method of finding the EDOs produced only 12- 19- 31- 41-... -EDOs and missed some other EDOs. That said, I'm ready to reconsider 22-EDO.
: As to “Folly of a Drunk”, it sound absolutely logical to my ear, and nice to hear. The only problem with it is: can you produce and publish some more? :-)