User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 215:

:::::::::::::::::: Great, "7/4 and the other paradiatonic intervals... not diatonic intervals" — whatever it is, what tonal system did you mean? Or, rather, can you suggest any rational/harmonic (non-equal-division) tonal system which extends or replaces diatonic or set of diatonic systems, is not based on the "tonality diamond", is well-rounded and self-sufficient, interesting, with good potential?..

::::::::::::::::::: At a certain point, I don't think you can totally replace the diatonic scales at a certain point- namely because of their connections to the 3 prime- but you can definitely extend it to a paradiatonic system like the one I proposed using the intervals 1/1, 33/32, 256/243, 16/15, 35/32, 9/8, 8/7, 64/55, 32/27, 77/64, 39/32, 16/13, 5/4, 81/64, 128/99, 4/3, 11/8, 45/32, 64/45, 16/11, 3/2, 99/64, 128/81, 8/5, 13/8, 64/39, 128/77, 27/16, 55/32, 7/4, 16/9, 64/35, 15/8, 243/128, 64/33, and 2/1. It can be extended further, but I'm pretty sure that extending it as far as I would want to go with it would make things really hard without eventually having to temper out commas. Truth be told, I don't base my work entirely on the tonality diamond when I do my work within any given key- at least not to my knowledge.

:::::::::::::::::: Don't you think that some musical ideas did not see proper consideration simply because the creation of the musical instrument just for experimental purposes could not be considered as feasible? But I have in my hands the technology which makes it easy to design a brand new instrument rendering any thinkable tonal systems or the set of them, modify any thinkable properties on the fly, even during playing, developed in an exclusively short time frame, so good amount of experimenting can be done quickly without much regret for the process of the instrument crafting, as its design can be easily thrown out or modified?

::::::::::::::::::: It may be true that some musical ideas did not see proper consideration for the reasons you're saying. However, I don't seem to understand why you replied to me quite the way you did... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::: For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many times when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 215: / Line 215: @@
 :::::::::::::::::: Great, "7/4 and the other paradiatonic intervals... not diatonic intervals" &mdash; whatever it is, what tonal system did you mean? Or, rather, can you suggest any rational/harmonic (non-equal-division) tonal system which extends or replaces diatonic or set of diatonic systems, is not based on the "tonality diamond", is well-rounded and self-sufficient, interesting, with good potential?..
+::::::::::::::::::: At a certain point, I don't think you can totally replace the diatonic scales at a certain point- namely because of their connections to the 3 prime- but you can definitely extend it to a paradiatonic system like the one I proposed using the intervals 1/1, 33/32, 256/243, 16/15, 35/32, 9/8, 8/7, 64/55, 32/27, 77/64, 39/32, 16/13, 5/4, 81/64, 128/99, 4/3, 11/8, 45/32, 64/45, 16/11, 3/2, 99/64, 128/81, 8/5, 13/8, 64/39, 128/77, 27/16, 55/32, 7/4, 16/9, 64/35, 15/8, 243/128, 64/33, and 2/1.  It can be extended further, but I'm pretty sure that extending it as far as I would want to go with it would make things really hard without eventually having to temper out commas.  Truth be told, I don't base my work entirely on the tonality diamond when I do my work within any given key- at least not to my knowledge.
 :::::::::::::::::: Don't you think that some musical ideas did not see proper consideration simply because the creation of the musical instrument just for experimental purposes could not be considered as feasible? But I have in my hands the technology which makes it easy to design a brand new instrument rendering any thinkable tonal systems or the set of them, modify any thinkable properties on the fly, even during playing, developed in an exclusively short time frame, so good amount of experimenting can be done quickly without much regret for the process of the instrument crafting, as its design can be easily thrown out or modified?
+::::::::::::::::::: It may be true that some musical ideas did not see proper consideration for the reasons you're saying.  However, I don't seem to understand why you replied to me quite the way you did... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::::::::: For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many times when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)