User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 189:

::::::: I'm curious... What is it about my diatonic scale system that appeals to you? It's true that in addition to the diatonic scales, we need to cover the other scales I've mentioned, but still... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::: First of all, the way you put it reminds me of my old tune-on-the fly idea and inspired the idea to come from a different side. This is related to the problem of the impossibility of transpositions and harmonic modulation (using traditional fixed-tune instrument) with just intonation, that is, the traditional instrument should be re-tuned to play with a different scale. Now, as I already design non-sequential keyboards, instead of re-tune I can simply create a keyboard where all 7 scales are presented at the same time in rows. Another idea would be to assign the individual transposition values to each row (representing one of 7 scales), which also should be shifted on the fly. Now (as I already asked you), here is my question for you: do you agree that it is possible to combine several fragments of musical motion with different scales in one piece of music? If you agree, we could practically overcome the barrier: we could have the instrument playing purely harmonic intervals "locally", and, at the same time, capable of harmonic modulation and other motion beyond the usual just-intonation scope. What do you think?

:::::::: I also wanted to ask you: how original is your design of diatonic scales? Apparently, special-case mixolydian fully matches known just intonation, it has to, but other scales have different sets of ratio. What part of it you personally designed or invented?

== Javascript ==

@@ Line 189: / Line 189: @@
 ::::::: I'm curious...  What is it about my diatonic scale system that appeals to you?  It's true that in addition to the diatonic scales, we need to cover the other scales I've mentioned, but still... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::: First of all, the way you put it reminds me of my old tune-on-the fly idea and inspired the idea to come from a different side. This is related to the problem of the impossibility of transpositions and harmonic modulation (using traditional fixed-tune instrument) with just intonation, that is, the traditional instrument should be re-tuned to play with a different scale. Now, as I already design non-sequential keyboards, instead of re-tune I can simply create a keyboard where all 7 scales are presented at the same time in rows. Another idea would be to assign the individual transposition values to each row (representing one of 7 scales), which also should be shifted on the fly. Now (as I already asked you), here is my question for you: do you agree that it is possible to combine several fragments of musical motion with different scales in one piece of music? If you agree, we could practically overcome the barrier: we could have the instrument playing purely harmonic intervals "locally", and, at the same time, capable of harmonic modulation and other motion beyond the usual just-intonation scope. What do you think?
+:::::::: I also wanted to ask you: how original is your design of diatonic scales? Apparently, special-case mixolydian fully matches known just intonation, it has to, but other scales have different sets of ratio. What part of it you personally designed or invented?
 == Javascript ==