SAKryukov
Joined 23 November 2020
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::::::: Nice reference material on diatonic scales! Interestingly how EDO simplify things: for any 7-element diatonic system rendered as any EDO, it would be enough to describe only one mode, and then say: all other modes are derived by starting from the next element and then cycling through the remaining 6 sequential elements, and then shift by one until you get all 7 modern "natural" diatonic modes. It's remarkable that many musicians don't capture this simple idea from a school where they are taught each natural mode separately. | ::::::: Nice reference material on diatonic scales! Interestingly how EDO simplify things: for any 7-element diatonic system rendered as any EDO, it would be enough to describe only one mode, and then say: all other modes are derived by starting from the next element and then cycling through the remaining 6 sequential elements, and then shift by one until you get all 7 modern "natural" diatonic modes. It's remarkable that many musicians don't capture this simple idea from a school where they are taught each natural mode separately. | ||
:::::::: Thanks! I should point out that 159edo doesn't simplify things that much- only joining the Locrian and Lydian diatonic scales into modes of a single diatonic scale. Besides, when you actually look at the harmonic functions of the notes in the different diatonic "modes", you find that it actually ''does'' make sense to try and separate them due to their differing tuning proclivities. I still have to do some work on that page though. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: I'm going to remove my reply message from your "talk" page as redundant and replace with the notice that you have a reply on my page... | ::: I'm going to remove my reply message from your "talk" page as redundant and replace with the notice that you have a reply on my page... | ||