User talk:Rperlner: Difference between revisions

Line 38:

::::: The most recent comments in [[Talk:159edo notation #My Second Idea for a Notation System|the last section of the 159edo notation talk page]] reflect the current state of affairs for the most part, but something tells me we have yet to finalize things. I'm glad you think my proposals to be mostly reasonable, and I do agree that in systems that temper out the Rastma, the accidentals that differ by a Rastma should be taken as synonyms of the normal quartertone accidentals by the Musescore plugin. I'd be happy to get your input on this, and we need to get Xenwolf back into this as well. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

::::: You say that you like being able to switch the tuning from one EDO to another and have it sound as similar as possible given the EDOs... Well, I must point out that 159edo can pull some serious shenanigans on this front, mimicking 12edo, 14edo, 17edo, 19edo, 22edo, 24edo, 27edo, 31edo, 35edo, and 41edo- yes, I'm currently writing a song that changes between these mid-piece. Yes, that means I would like to see representation of both 81/80 and the rastma, and I do have some ideas for that- namely separating out the syntonic arrows into their own glyphs, which then can be combined with another combining glyph representing the rastma. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

::::: You say that you like being able to switch the tuning from one EDO to another and have it sound as similar as possible given the EDOs... Well, I must point out that 159edo can pull some serious shenanigans on this front, mimicking 12edo, 14edo, 17edo, 19edo, 22edo, 24edo, 27edo, 31edo, 35edo, and 41edo- yes, I'm currently writing a song that changes between these different retunings mid-piece. Yes, that means I would like to see representation of both 81/80 and the rastma, and I do have some ideas for that- namely separating out the syntonic arrows into their own glyphs, which then can be combined with another combining glyph representing the rastma. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

::::: Tridecimal Rastma doesn't sound like the most catchy name for 512/507, and "Rastma" itself seems to be related to "Rast", which is a term from Turkish, Arabic and Persian music. Therefore, we need something better, and I'll be happy to discuss this with you. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 ::::: The most recent comments in [[Talk:159edo notation #My Second Idea for a Notation System|the last section of the 159edo notation talk page]] reflect the current state of affairs for the most part, but something tells me we have yet to finalize things.  I'm glad you think my proposals to be mostly reasonable, and I do agree that in systems that temper out the Rastma, the accidentals that differ by a Rastma should be taken as synonyms of the normal quartertone accidentals by the Musescore plugin.  I'd be happy to get your input on this, and we need to get Xenwolf back into this as well.  --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
-::::: You say that you like being able to switch the tuning from one EDO to another and have it sound as similar as possible given the EDOs...  Well, I must point out that 159edo can pull some serious shenanigans on this front, mimicking 12edo, 14edo, 17edo, 19edo, 22edo, 24edo, 27edo, 31edo, 35edo, and 41edo- yes, I'm currently writing a song that changes between these mid-piece.  Yes, that means I would like to see representation of both 81/80 and the rastma, and I do have some ideas for that- namely separating out the syntonic arrows into their own glyphs, which then can be combined with another combining glyph representing the rastma. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
+::::: You say that you like being able to switch the tuning from one EDO to another and have it sound as similar as possible given the EDOs...  Well, I must point out that 159edo can pull some serious shenanigans on this front, mimicking 12edo, 14edo, 17edo, 19edo, 22edo, 24edo, 27edo, 31edo, 35edo, and 41edo- yes, I'm currently writing a song that changes between these different retunings mid-piece.  Yes, that means I would like to see representation of both 81/80 and the rastma, and I do have some ideas for that- namely separating out the syntonic arrows into their own glyphs, which then can be combined with another combining glyph representing the rastma. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 ::::: Tridecimal Rastma doesn't sound like the most catchy name for 512/507, and "Rastma" itself seems to be related to "Rast", which is a term from Turkish, Arabic and Persian music.  Therefore, we need something better, and I'll be happy to discuss this with you. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)