Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Scherzo in 26 EDO: new section
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
m Scherzo in 26 EDO: some minor changes
Line 8: Line 8:


Hi Ray, <br>  
Hi Ray, <br>  
your Scherzo in [[26edo|26 EDO]] sounds good. The notation looks quite uncommon to readers of classic music, but interesting. After a bit of calculation I found out that the accidentals actually cause a 1\26 shift. Notating the piece in "B" causes that no double-flats have to be used (also F# and C# would allow this). I think we should have at least one article about circle-of-fifths notation(s). Thanks for sharing. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC) <br>
your '''Scherzo in 26 EDO''' sounds great. The notation looks quite uncommon to readers of classic music but interesting. After a bit of calculation I found out that the accidentals actually cause a 1\[[26edo|26]] shift. Notating the piece in "B" causes that no double-flats have to be used (also F# and C# would allow this). I think we should have at least one article about circle-of-fifths notation(s) in the XenWiki. Thanks for sharing. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC) <br>
<small>PS: the sixfold ''forte'' in the 3rd-last bar before ''Fine'' seems like a glitch to me. </small>
<small>PS: the sixfold ''forte'' in the 3rd-last bar before ''Fine'' seems like a glitch to me. </small>