Talk:5/4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→"classic" misleading: new section |
→"classic" misleading: alternative suggestions |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
To me it seems we'd better name it "just major third". The word "classic" is so closely related to [[wikipedia:classical music|Classical music]] that it suggests 4\12 or some meantone variant. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | To me it seems we'd better name it "just major third". The word "classic" is so closely related to [[wikipedia:classical music|Classical music]] that it suggests 4\12 or some meantone variant. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
: We could instead add one ore more of: "octave-reduced 5th harmonic", "harmonic third", "natural third" ... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:58, 9 October 2020
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
"classic" misleading
To me it seems we'd better name it "just major third". The word "classic" is so closely related to Classical music that it suggests 4\12 or some meantone variant. --Xenwolf (talk) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)