Talk:33/32: Difference between revisions

Line 30:

:::: For the record, I can see keeping the listings of Prime, Second, Third and Forth and such as size listings, since that is how many microtonal composers from a background like mine tend to measure interval size. However, in the end, one of my main concerns in naming intervals- and even in coming up with the musical function map- is making things more accessible for microtonal composers with my type of background, while bridging to strikingly new areas of tonality such as treble-down tonality. Yes, this means coming up with new terminology in some respects. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

:::: As for how this should work on the wiki itself, I propose that if something can be classified as both a fourth and a fifth- or some other such thing, it should be put under both "fourth" and "fifth" categories- specifically under a special subcategory for intervals with such an ambiguous nature... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:39, 18 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:42, 18 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:::: For the record, I can see keeping the listings of Prime, Second, Third and Forth and such as size listings, since that is how many microtonal composers from a background like mine tend to measure interval size. However, in the end, one of my main concerns in naming intervals- and even in coming up with the musical function map- is making things more accessible for microtonal composers with my type of background, while bridging to strikingly new areas of tonality such as treble-down tonality. Yes, this means coming up with new terminology in some respects. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)		:::: For the record, I can see keeping the listings of Prime, Second, Third and Forth and such as size listings, since that is how many microtonal composers from a background like mine tend to measure interval size. However, in the end, one of my main concerns in naming intervals- and even in coming up with the musical function map- is making things more accessible for microtonal composers with my type of background, while bridging to strikingly new areas of tonality such as treble-down tonality. Yes, this means coming up with new terminology in some respects. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

			:::: As for how this should work on the wiki itself, I propose that if something can be classified as both a fourth and a fifth- or some other such thing, it should be put under both "fourth" and "fifth" categories- specifically under a special subcategory for intervals with such an ambiguous nature... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)