Talk:33/32: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Right, one thing that needs to be made clear here is that 33/32 really does serve multiple roles. Flora, you may not know this, but blues music ''does'' sometimes see 11/8 passed through on the way to roughly 15/11 as a means of further diminishing the flat fifth, before then resolving to 4/3. I know this because I've met a composer who's familiar with this aspect of blues music. When I introduced the idea of 11/8 as a fourth to him, he said he had never thought of resolving it up to 3/2 like I usually do. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC) | Right, one thing that needs to be made clear here is that 33/32 really does serve multiple roles. Flora, you may not know this, but blues music ''does'' sometimes see 11/8 passed through on the way to roughly 15/11 as a means of further diminishing the flat fifth, before then resolving to 4/3. I know this because I've met a composer who's familiar with this aspect of blues music. When I introduced the idea of 11/8 as a fourth to him, he said he had never thought of resolving it up to 3/2 like I usually do. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
Effectively, this shrinking of the flat fifth results in F-demisharp being higher than G-Sesquiflat. It can be compared to | Effectively, this shrinking of the flat fifth results in F-demisharp being higher than G-Sesquiflat. It can be compared to the similar situation in which the Pythagorean Chromatic semitone being larger than the Pythagorean Diatonic semitone, with the result that C-sharp is higher than D-Flat. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |