Talk:33/32: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
: The same arguments seem to apply to [[64/33]] [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=64/33&diff=prev&oldid=49775] [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=64%2F33&type=revision&diff=49778&oldid=49775]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC) | : The same arguments seem to apply to [[64/33]] [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=64/33&diff=prev&oldid=49775] [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=64%2F33&type=revision&diff=49778&oldid=49775]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
Right, one thing that needs to be made clear here is that 33/32 really does serve multiple roles. | Right, one thing that needs to be made clear here is that 33/32 really does serve multiple roles. Flora, you may not know this, but blues music ''does'' sometimes see 11/8 passed through on the way to roughly 15/11 as a means of further diminishing the flat fifth, before then resolving to 4/3. I know this because I've met a composer who's familiar with this aspect of blues music. When I introduced the idea of 11/8 as a fourth to him, he said he had never thought of resolving it up to 3/2 like I usually do. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |