EDT: Difference between revisions

Line 751:

| | [[96edt]]

| |

| | 96edt falls exactly halfway between 60 and 61 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\121 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.8¢ ~~or smaller~~.

| | 96edt falls exactly halfway between 60 and 61 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\121 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.8¢.

|-

| | [[97edt]]

Line 763:

| | [[99edt]]

| |

| | 99edt falls exactly halfway between 62 and 63 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\125 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.2¢ ~~or smaller~~.

| | 99edt falls exactly halfway between 62 and 63 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\125 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.2¢.

|-

| | [[100edt]]

Line 782:

| | [[104edt]]

| |

| | 104edt falls exactly halfway between 65 and 66 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\131 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~18.3¢ ~~or smaller~~.

| | 104edt falls exactly halfway between 65 and 66 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\131 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~18.3¢.

|-

| | [[105edt]]

Line 794:

| | [[107edt]]

| |

| | 107edt falls exactly halfway between 67 and 68 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\135 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.~~8¢ or smaller~~.

| | 107edt falls exactly halfway between 67 and 68 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\135 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.8¢r.

|-

| | [[108edt]]

Line 806:

| | [[110edt]]

| |

| | 110edt falls exactly halfway between 69 and 70 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\139 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.3¢ ~~or smaller~~.

| | 110edt falls exactly halfway between 69 and 70 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\139 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.3¢.

|-

| | [[111edt]]

Line 977:

| | [[153edt]]

| |

| | 153edt falls exactly halfway between 96 and 97 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\193 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~12.4¢ ~~or smaller~~.

| | 153edt falls exactly halfway between 96 and 97 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\193 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~12.4¢.

|-

| | [[154edt]]

Line 1,173:

| | [[202edt]]

| |

| | 202edt falls exactly halfway between 127 and 128 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\255 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~9.42¢ ~~or smaller~~.

| | 202edt falls exactly halfway between 127 and 128 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\255 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~9.42¢.

|-

| | [[203edt]]

Line 1,237:

| [[218edt]]

|

| 218edt falls exactly halfway between 137 and 138 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\275 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~8.725¢ ~~or smaller~~.

| 218edt falls exactly halfway between 137 and 138 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\275 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~8.725¢.

|-

| [[219edt]]

@@ Line 751: / Line 751: @@
 | | [[96edt]]
 | |
-| | 96edt falls exactly halfway between 60 and 61 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\121 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.8¢ or smaller.
+| | 96edt falls exactly halfway between 60 and 61 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\121 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.8¢.
 |-
 | | [[97edt]]
@@ Line 763: / Line 763: @@
 | | [[99edt]]
 | |
-| | 99edt falls exactly halfway between 62 and 63 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\125 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.2¢ or smaller.
+| | 99edt falls exactly halfway between 62 and 63 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\125 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~19.2¢.
 |-
 | | [[100edt]]
@@ Line 782: / Line 782: @@
 | | [[104edt]]
 | |
-| | 104edt falls exactly halfway between 65 and 66 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\131 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~18.3¢ or smaller.
+| | 104edt falls exactly halfway between 65 and 66 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\131 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~18.3¢.
 |-
 | | [[105edt]]
@@ Line 794: / Line 794: @@
 | | [[107edt]]
 | |
-| | 107edt falls exactly halfway between 67 and 68 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\135 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.8¢ or smaller.
+| | 107edt falls exactly halfway between 67 and 68 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\135 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.8¢r.
 |-
 | | [[108edt]]
@@ Line 806: / Line 806: @@
 | | [[110edt]]
 | |
-| | 110edt falls exactly halfway between 69 and 70 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\139 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.3¢ or smaller.
+| | 110edt falls exactly halfway between 69 and 70 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\139 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~17.3¢.
 |-
 | | [[111edt]]
@@ Line 977: / Line 977: @@
 | | [[153edt]]
 | |
-| | 153edt falls exactly halfway between 96 and 97 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\193 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~12.4¢ or smaller.
+| | 153edt falls exactly halfway between 96 and 97 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\193 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~12.4¢.
 |-
 | | [[154edt]]
@@ Line 1,173: / Line 1,173: @@
 | | [[202edt]]
 | |
-| | 202edt falls exactly halfway between 127 and 128 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\255 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~9.42¢ or smaller.
+| | 202edt falls exactly halfway between 127 and 128 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\255 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~9.42¢.
 |-
 | | [[203edt]]
@@ Line 1,237: / Line 1,237: @@
 | [[218edt]]
 |
-| 218edt falls exactly halfway between 137 and 138 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\275 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~8.725¢ or smaller.
+| 218edt falls exactly halfway between 137 and 138 edos, so it strongly resembles the scale with generator 2\275 of an octave, but technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of ~8.725¢.
 |-
 | [[219edt]]

EDT: Difference between revisions

Moremajorthanmajor (talk | contribs)