Relative cent: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|128 | |128 | ||
|1536 (600<sub>16</sub>) | |1536 (600<sub>16</sub>) 7mu | ||
|74.875 (4A.E01<sub>16</sub>) | |74.875 (4A.E01<sub>16</sub>) | ||
|''898.502 (382.81<sub>16</sub>)'' | |''898.502 (382.81<sub>16</sub>) 7mu'' | ||
|} | |} | ||
In other words, only each 12th divisor of the next 28 after 100 has the same problem as 100 does for use as the base of a relative cent. Also, the last three have the problem that they put 3/2 in the middle of a cent. | In other words, only each 12th divisor of the next 28 after 100 has the same problem as 100 does for use as the base of a relative cent. Also, the last three have the problem that they put 3/2 in the middle of a cent. | ||