Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Terms of Service: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
We just went and made this. Because when you sign up for an account, it asks you to agree to this page, and this page was blank. lol. | We just went and made this. Because when you sign up for an account, it asks you to agree to this page, and this page was blank. lol. | ||
W'''Bold text'''ording is from one-on-one back and forths I've had with Kite, Jacob, Stephen W. | |||
Then was OKed by site co-hoster Mike B. | Then was OKed by site co-hoster Mike B. | ||
And he helped clarify the language. | And he helped clarify the language. | ||
When I've brought up before on the Facebook Xen Wiki group about adding something like this, people who don't have much skin in the game (non-editors and rarely-editors) SCREECHED at me and called me all kinds of names. I'm not sure why anyone would want to defend not booting actual trolls, but apparently some people do. | When I've brought up before on the Facebook Xen Wiki group about adding something like this, people who don't have much skin in the game (non-editors and rarely-editors) SCREECHED at me and called me all kinds of names. I'm not sure why anyone would want to defend not booting actual trolls, but apparently some people do. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
Between that, and this, it should be far less crazy making to contribute to, and read, this site going forth. To those who helped make that happen. | Between that, and this, it should be far less crazy making to contribute to, and read, this site going forth. To those who helped make that happen. | ||
Thank you for your service! | Thank you for your service! | ||
''' | |||
Quote From [http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/808 The Great Failure of Wikipedia], 2004 article by Jason Scott: | |||
From [http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/808 The Great Failure of Wikipedia], article by Jason Scott: | "This is what the inherent failure of wikipedia is. It’s that there’s a small set of content generators, a massive amount of wonks and twiddlers, and then a heaping amount of procedural whackjobs. And the mass of twiddlers and procedural whackjobs means that the content generators stop being so and have to become content defenders."''' | ||
"This is what the inherent failure of wikipedia is. It’s that there’s a small set of content generators, a massive amount of wonks and twiddlers, and then a heaping amount of procedural whackjobs. And the mass of twiddlers and procedural whackjobs means that the content generators stop being so and have to become content defenders." | |||
--- | --- | ||