Talk:Chordal space: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikispaces>FREEZE
No edit summary
 
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
----
----



Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018

ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW

All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.

PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS ABOVE THIS SECTION. Anything below here is for archival purposes only.


Wikipedia backups

the article was a backup of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chordal_space

Should we mark theese backups in a special manner? Should we have a closer look at Wikipedia articles that are accused of original research?

- xenwolf June 20, 2010, 04:08:54 AM UTC-0700


You could come up with a tag for them, and yes getting previous versions of other articles which had content removed would be a good project.

- genewardsmith June 20, 2010, 11:35:09 AM UTC-0700