Subgroup temperaments: Difference between revisions
m these are a bit split up/decimated w.r.t the original organisation being purely on the comma page so im recommending extra emphasis on linking this comma |
m →MVP archagall: note 83edo as approximately optimal |
||
| Line 509: | Line 509: | ||
== 2.75.85 subgroup == | == 2.75.85 subgroup == | ||
=== MVP archagall === | === MVP archagall === | ||
By tempering out the comma [[24576/24565]] in the 2.75.85 subgroup, we have three [[85/64]]'s up and one octave down as a [[75/64]] and we have two [[128/85]]'s up and one octave down as a [[17/15]] whole tone. It is because of this combination of accuracy, efficiency and mapping-wise simplicity and its corresponding explanatory power in what this comma does that the comma has been named the ''archagallisma''. The ''MVP'' stands for ''minimum viable product'', as this is the core of what the archagall logic achieves, with further extensions adding to the subgroup while avoiding significantly impacting its accuracy. This is a highly accurate temperament that could be considered to be encoding the "high-accuracy logic" of [[superpyth]] and which is inescapably related to the [[17L 5s]] scale form as it is the 17 & 22 temperament (or less accurately, the 5 & 17 temperament) in the 2.75.85 subgroup. | By tempering out the comma [[24576/24565]] in the 2.75.85 subgroup, we have three [[85/64]]'s up and one octave down as a [[75/64]] and we have two [[128/85]]'s up and one octave down as a [[17/15]] whole tone. It is because of this combination of accuracy, efficiency and mapping-wise simplicity and its corresponding explanatory power in what this comma does that the comma has been named the ''archagallisma''. The ''MVP'' stands for ''minimum viable product'', as this is the core of what the archagall logic achieves, with further extensions adding to the subgroup while avoiding significantly impacting its accuracy. This is a highly accurate temperament that could be considered to be encoding the "high-accuracy logic" of [[superpyth]] and which is inescapably related to the [[17L 5s]] scale form as it is the 17 & 22 temperament (or less accurately, the 5 & 17 temperament) in the 2.75.85 subgroup. | ||
It is perhaps worth noting that [[83edo]] is approximately an optimal tuning for getting all of [[75/64]], [[85/64]] and the interval between them, [[17/15]], close to just, in that larger tunings compromise on tone-efficiency. | |||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.75.85 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.75.85 | ||