Kite's thoughts on hi-lo notation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:32, 13 September 2026 view source TallKite (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Sysops 4,223 edits added a section on generalized voicings Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:34, 13 September 2026 view source TallKite (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Sysops 4,223 edits mNo edit summary Tag: Visual edit Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Overview ==
	Hi-lo notation is for naming chord voicings. It applies to all tunings, even conventional ones like 12-edo or meantone. It allows arrangers, composers and theorists to discuss specific voicings much more accurately than the conventional 1st inversion, 2nd inversion, etc. nomenclature.		Hi-lo notation is for naming chord voicings. It applies to all tunings, even conventional ones like 12-edo or meantone. It allows arrangers, composers and theorists to discuss specific voicings much more accurately than the conventional 1st inversion, 2nd inversion, etc. nomenclature.