S-expression: Difference between revisions
m →Equivalent S-expressions: S6 = S8*S9 implies S4/(S6*S7) trivially, while the other expression isnt usefully simple. furthermore, it's implied from S9 = S6/S8 or equivalently S6 = S8*S9 |
m →Examples: missing alternate expression for 176/175 |
||
| Line 3,368: | Line 3,368: | ||
| [[176/175]] | | [[176/175]] | ||
| S8/S10 | | S8/S10 | ||
| | |S22⋅S23⋅S24 | ||
| | | | ||
|(S26⋅S27)²/S351 | |(S26⋅S27)²/S351 | ||