Indian music: Difference between revisions
AthiTrydhen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Scales themselves are taken from a twelve-tone framework in both traditions, but the naming practices are a bit different. In North India, notes can be natural (shuddh), sharp (tivra), or flat (komal). The natural notes form a major scale (0 2 4 5 7 9 11). Sa and Pa are never sharp or flat; Ma can be sharp or natural; Re, Ga, Dha and Ni can be flat or natural. | Scales themselves are taken from a twelve-tone framework in both traditions, but the naming practices are a bit different. In North India, notes can be natural (shuddh), sharp (tivra), or flat (komal). The natural notes form a major scale (0 2 4 5 7 9 11). Sa and Pa are never sharp or flat; Ma can be sharp or natural; Re, Ga, Dha and Ni can be flat or natural. | ||
In South India, things are a bit more complex, and it's best illustrated with a table. Sa and Pa have only one | In South India, things are a bit more complex, and it's best illustrated with a table. Sa and Pa have only one version, Ma has two, and Re, Ga, Dha, and Ni have three each. On the surface, it would appear to make a 16-tone framework, but some names refer to the same pitch category, much like enharmonics in Western music. The names are also more fanciful in Carnatic music. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ | |+ | ||