User:Eufalesio/Ultimate: Difference between revisions
Partial reversal on the summary table, did some explaining Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Things |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
is 41&53&217, with mapping | is 41&53&217, with mapping {{Mapping|1 0 0 25 -33 -13|0 1 0 -14 23 12|0 0 1 0 0 -1}}. It's otherwise known by in the wiki as ''[[cassaschismic]]'' (technical info inside), also [[User:Eufalesio/Important Tables#Temperament properties of Ultimate edos (I care about)|here]]; but I will simply call it '''Ultimate'''. My reasoning of this will become clear. Or at least, I expect you to understand why it's clear in my mind. | ||
Special thanks for [[Kite Giedraitis]] for feedback and edits. | |||
== Quick definition == | == Quick definition == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
et cetera... | et cetera... | ||
The [[pergen]] is (P8, P5, ^1), where ^1 is the "minicomma"; a 3~5c interval that represents 385/384, 352/351, 5120/5103, 513/512, the layoma, etc. 4:5:6:7:9:11:13 is notated as P1 ^ | The [[pergen]] is (P8, P5, ^1), where ^1 is the "minicomma" (from this point forward refered to as "MC"); a 3~5c interval that represents 385/384, 352/351, 5120/5103, 513/512, the layoma, etc. 4:5:6:7:9:11:13 is notated as P1 ^'''↓'''M3 P5 '''↓'''m7 M9 ↑↑11 v↑↑m13. Using pomas (pythagorean commas, [↑/'''↓''']) improves this notation for reasons that will be exposed later. | ||
=== Interval list === | === Interval list === | ||
Here is a quick compressed cheat sheet of octave-reduced intervals. This is a MASSIVE simplification with many (infinitely many) intervals left out for the sake of brevity. For every entry here, | Here is a quick compressed cheat sheet of octave-reduced intervals. This is a MASSIVE simplification with many (infinitely many) intervals left out for the sake of brevity. For every entry here, ratios here represent pitch-classes and their pitch class inverses; so for instance 8/5 pitch class is mapped to +8 fifths -1 MC, being the octave inverse of 5/4 pitch class negates the mappings so it is found at -8 fifths + 1 MC. There are no octave reduced primes or prime inverses with positive fifth-span and MC-span. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
! | ! | ||
! colspan="2" | | ! colspan="2" |MC-span | ||
|- | |- | ||
!'''Fifth-span''' | !'''Fifth-span''' | ||
| Line 139: | Line 141: | ||
94edo is in my opinion the optimal cassandra equal tuning with a poma of 25.5c, tempered just enough for the 13-limit to reach <4 cents of error and very easy to use. | 94edo is in my opinion the optimal cassandra equal tuning with a poma of 25.5c, tempered just enough for the 13-limit to reach <4 cents of error and very easy to use. | ||
However, if you forgo p5 and p13 for the chain of fifths, you end up with [[gary]]. Gary is a serendipitous temperament, the same as cassandra but optimized for the [[zala]]. 135edo is an essentially perfect tuning, reaching sub-cent levels of error in the subgroup, with a poma of 26. | However, if you forgo p5 and p13 for the chain of fifths, you end up with [[gary]]. Gary is a serendipitous temperament, the same as cassandra but optimized for the [[zala]]. 135edo is an essentially perfect tuning, reaching sub-cent levels of error in the subgroup, with a poma of 26.{{Overline|6}} c. | ||
Ultimate is not just an extension of the concept, but what I believe to be the '''end''' of that extension. Ultimate adds an independent minicomma generator for p5 and p13, which acts as 385/384, ~352/351, ~5120/5103, layoma, ... etc, being around 4.4c. It doesn't begin to make sense up until 217edo, but 270edo and 311edo are arguably the best tunings. 217edo is alright, but not the best, which would make it a waste of time if it weren't a multiple of 31edo. | Ultimate is not just an extension of the concept, but what I believe to be the '''end''' of that extension. Ultimate adds an independent "minicomma" generator for p5 and p13, which acts as 385/384, ~352/351, ~5120/5103, layoma, ... etc, being around 4.4c. It doesn't begin to make sense up until 217edo, but 270edo and 311edo are arguably the best tunings. 217edo is alright, but not the best, which would make it a waste of time if it weren't a multiple of 31edo. | ||
'''The key reasons''' on why Ultimate is ultimate, is ultimately due to the fact that 270edo and 311edo are inside the supported equal tunings, because going any further would make the edosteps not discernible, and because no other edo in their vicinity is as good as them. Beyond that, I see no reason to use edos. | '''The key reasons''' on why Ultimate is ultimate, is ultimately due to the fact that 270edo and 311edo are inside the supported equal tunings, because going any further would make the edosteps not discernible, and because no other edo in their vicinity is as good as them. Beyond that, I see no reason to use edos. | ||
| Line 150: | Line 152: | ||
{{EDOs|12e, 41, 53, 94, 217, 270, 311}} are all part of the same rank-3 tuning, so it allows a piece or a production to be written using the notation, which encodes the same mappings. Of course, using the notation to its fullest extent only makes sense for the finer 217, 270, 311. This necessarily means that there are levels of precision to Ultimate. (The notation ideas are heavily WIP) | {{EDOs|12e, 41, 53, 94, 217, 270, 311}} are all part of the same rank-3 tuning, so it allows a piece or a production to be written using the notation, which encodes the same mappings. Of course, using the notation to its fullest extent only makes sense for the finer 217, 270, 311. This necessarily means that there are levels of precision to Ultimate. (The notation ideas are heavily WIP) | ||
=== 12e === | ==== 12e ==== | ||
The coarsest tuning that makes sense. It can be written just with sharps and flats, since the poma and the | The coarsest tuning that makes sense. It can be written just with sharps and flats, since the poma and the MC are tempered out in all its possible expressions. 12e because patent val tunes 11/8 as a tritone, not fourth. The cassandra mapping is based on 11/8 as a kind of fourth, not tritone. Either way, p11 is NOT there. Consider it an extremely coarse [[yazatha]] tuning. 24edo '''can't''' be used, as it uses a new mapping disjoint from the circle of fitfths and the poma is still tempered out. | ||
=== | === Cassandra edos === | ||
They are the simplest of the bunch and the easiest to work with. They can be written with sharps and flats, ↑/'''↓''' for the pomas reaching qualites of p5 and p7, and ⇑/'''⇓''' for doubled pomas reaching qualities of p11 and p13. | |||
=== | ==== 41 ==== | ||
The coarsest true cassandra tuning. In the case of 41edo, there is no need for double pomas, because the apotome can be split in half. Thus, half sharps and half flats can be used instead of two pomas. This can '''ONLY''' be done in 41edo. Ideal for 11-limit pieces with acoustic instruments, like the well known [[Kite guitar]], albeit, it is not a cassandra layout, but [[Skip fretting system 41 2 13]]. The cassandra layout is [[skip fretting system 41 3 7]]. | |||
=== | ==== 53 ==== | ||
Another good cassandra tuning. It is playable and around the extremum possible inside the [[Lumatone mapping for 103edo|Lumatone]], which despite having a p7 and p11 that are not too well tuned (though its p7 is good enough for some); it has good 13-limit capabilities, and a pure fifth that's a gift to many. The cassandra layout can used in a guitar with the [[skip freting system 53 4 9]]. | |||
=== | ==== 94 ==== | ||
Best cassandra tuning. Since the chain takes much longer to close, ¡ and ! may be used to raise or lower by a half-poma. (Note that a half-poma implies a half-octave, and thus an even-numbered edo). This tuning is optimal and technically usable in the Lumatone, but only as a subset, requiring more than one preset to reach within the [[Standard Lumatone mapping for Pythagorean]]. The cassandra layout can be used in a guitar with the [[skip fretting system 94 7 16]]. However, in a 6-string guitar there will be no other unisons. | |||
Note that 94edo is already quite fine for most real instruments, and though its step is very much discernible, human error can begin to slip pitches into the wrong edostep even in very skilled musicians. | |||
=== Non-cassandra Ultimate === | |||
They are very fine and likely impossible to implement into real instruments. They can be written with sharps and flats, ↑/'''↓''' for the pomas, ⇑/'''⇓''' for doubled pomas, and the addition of ^/v for the MC, taken directly from the [[Kite's ups and downs notation|ups-and-downs notation.]] This is completely unfeasible to use with a Lumatone or with any acoustic instrument. Though, it can still be used in a DAW without much problem. Because Ultimate is rank-3, the layout is 3D and thus it is impossible to play on a flat surface, requiring some sort of eldritch holographic "keyspace". | |||
==== 217 ==== | |||
217edo could ''in theory'' be used with binary valve or key systems in woodwinds, granted they have the intonation precision to reliably hit pitches within a maximum error of 2.76 cents. Which I know won't happen. Best course would be to tune the instrument to 31edo plus a slide to nudge everything into the right place, but that's not Ultimate. That's [[birds]]. | 217edo could ''in theory'' be used with binary valve or key systems in woodwinds, granted they have the intonation precision to reliably hit pitches within a maximum error of 2.76 cents. Which I know won't happen. Best course would be to tune the instrument to 31edo plus a slide to nudge everything into the right place, but that's not Ultimate. That's [[birds]]. | ||
==== 270 ==== | |||
Peak. 270edo could be approached with a 2D layout using [[Decoid]] layout, though this is hard to do on the Lumatone, having octaves that are very far apart. Just as 217edo, it can be approached using a subset, namely 27edo, but that's not Ultimate. That's [[ennealimmal]]. | |||
==== 311 ==== | |||
311edo is well known for its 41-odd-limit consistency, though it is right at the edge of practicality. Using equal tunings finer than this is hard to justify. Its yazalathana is a smidge worse than 270edo, but its natural improvement in all other primes and most importantly prime 23 could be of some use to someone. Not me! | |||
=== Ultimate ''sensu stricto'' === | === Ultimate ''sensu stricto'' === | ||
It is possible to forgo edos altogether and use Ultimate as is, providing the absolute best tuning possible. However, it's a rank-3 system. It has no extra unisons unlike the equal tunings. This is reserved for when 270edo is not just enough, and beating is something to avoid as much as possible. | It is possible to forgo edos altogether and use Ultimate as is, providing the absolute best tuning possible. However, it's a rank-3 system. It has no extra unisons unlike the equal tunings. This is reserved for when 270edo is not just enough, and beating is something to avoid as much as possible. The most error you'll get with this system resides in the chain of fifths (~+0.25c), having all other primes accurate to hundreds of a cent. This is in a sense is reminiscent of [[septimal meantone]], which can tune p5 and p7 near-pure by adding error to the fifth chain. | ||
== The special place of 94edo and 270edo == | == The special place of 94edo and 270edo == | ||
Of all the equal tunings supported by Ultimate, the best ones are 94edo and 270edo. They have the key property of being even, and thus also tempers out the [[kalisma]], allowing the poma to be split in halves. Using them this way is reminiscent of [[Gariwizmic]], a very similar temperament to Ultimate, but with the | Of all the equal tunings supported by Ultimate, the best ones are 94edo and 270edo. They have the key property of being even, and thus also tempers out the [[kalisma]], allowing the poma to be split in halves. Using them this way is reminiscent of [[Gariwizmic]], a very similar temperament to Ultimate, but with the MC found deep in the generator chain, not independent. This is useful for easier navigation within a DAW. | ||
It's possible to use Gariwizmic wholesale, | It's possible to use Gariwizmic wholesale, though it only slightly improves 270edo in precision, Ultimate is a much better choice for accuracy's sake. Gariwizmic provides structure, not the tuning. | ||