User talk:Francium/647edo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: I don't believe that simply having music written in it constitutes a reason to avoid deletion, particularly in cases such as this where it's extremely unclear how exactly the song uses the structures associated with the edo/tuning. 647 might as well just be an arbitrary number. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 04:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC) | : I don't believe that simply having music written in it constitutes a reason to avoid deletion, particularly in cases such as this where it's extremely unclear how exactly the song uses the structures associated with the edo/tuning. 647 might as well just be an arbitrary number. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 04:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: Fair, I guess my point is that there's a thousand more pages that don't even meet this very meager standard. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 17:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:37, 14 May 2026
Deletion
I vote keep, it has at least one song written in it! – Sintel🎏 (talk) 00:18, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Or maybe move to Francium's userspace. --Overthink (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't believe that simply having music written in it constitutes a reason to avoid deletion, particularly in cases such as this where it's extremely unclear how exactly the song uses the structures associated with the edo/tuning. 647 might as well just be an arbitrary number. --Lériendil (talk) 04:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC)