Ternary parallelogram scales are MOS substitution: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 84: Line 84:
Without loss of generality assume that '''u'''<sub>'''y'''</sub> = (''b'', ''c''), ''c'' > 0, and  '''u'''<sub>'''z'''</sub> = (''b'', ''c'' - ''n''). As the '''v'''-coordinates of both vectors are equal, we only need to look at the '''w'''-coordinate. Since the '''w'''-coordinate of a point must stay within [0 : ''n''], at any point it must follow the rule: "If the current '''w'''-coordinate + c &ge; ''n'', then move by ''c'' - ''n'' units (i.e. southward). Otherwise, move by ''c'' units (northward)."
Without loss of generality assume that '''u'''<sub>'''y'''</sub> = (''b'', ''c''), ''c'' > 0, and  '''u'''<sub>'''z'''</sub> = (''b'', ''c'' - ''n''). As the '''v'''-coordinates of both vectors are equal, we only need to look at the '''w'''-coordinate. Since the '''w'''-coordinate of a point must stay within [0 : ''n''], at any point it must follow the rule: "If the current '''w'''-coordinate + c &ge; ''n'', then move by ''c'' - ''n'' units (i.e. southward). Otherwise, move by ''c'' units (northward)."


This pattern of movements is in fact the same as the one produced by taking the circular word "1 1 1 ... 1 (1 - n)" and stacking ''c''-step subwords. As there is only one bad position per period, this word can easily be seen to be MOS by considering ''kc''-step subwords for 2 &le; ''k'' &le; length - 1.
This pattern of movements is in fact the same as the one produced by taking the circular word "1 1 1 ... 1 (1 - n)" and stacking ''c''-step subwords. As there is only one bad position per period, this word can easily be seen to be MOS by considering ''kc''-step subwords for 2 &le; ''k'' &le; length - 1. {{Qed}}
 
[[Category:Pages with proofs]]
[[Category:Pages with proofs]]