Talk:Meantone family: Difference between revisions

Line 263:

:::::: > Therefore, I think we should document three noncanonical temps: 19 & 50, 50 & 31, and 19 & 31. The situation is comparable to the grosstone range you analysed next, which I like and appreciate.

:::::: That's something to consider, though as I said, 19 & 50 doesn't really work with the septimal meantone mapping of 7 ([[Talk:Meantone#Unlisted(?) strong 7-limit Meantone extension (maybe related to Catasyc or Laruquadbiyoti?)|per Lucius]]), so I don't believe it's worth adding 19 & 50 to the meanpop extensions. I think keeping 19 & 31 and 50 & 31 makes sense though.

:::::: That's something to consider (and indeed none of these is deserving of canonicity compared to the others), though as I said, 19 & 50 doesn't really work with the septimal meantone mapping of 7 ([[Talk:Meantone#Unlisted(?) strong 7-limit Meantone extension (maybe related to Catasyc or Laruquadbiyoti?)|per Lucius]]), so I don't believe it's worth adding 19 & 50 to the meanpop extensions. I think keeping 19 & 31 and 50 & 31 makes sense though.

:::::: > > meanenneadecal vs vincenzo

:::::: I suppose I'll concede to ~~that~~, though I'd still rather the 11-limit temperament be called "vincenzo" than "meanenneadecal".

:::::: I suppose I'll concede to keeping both extensions in the 13-limit (though idk what the details of what either are in the 19-limit), though I'd still rather the 11-limit temperament be called "vincenzo" than "meanenneadecal".

:::::: > dominant

:::::: Fine with that proposal. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 16:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 263: / Line 263: @@
 :::::: > Therefore, I think we should document three noncanonical temps: 19 & 50, 50 & 31, and 19 & 31. The situation is comparable to the grosstone range you analysed next, which I like and appreciate.
-:::::: That's something to consider, though as I said, 19 & 50 doesn't really work with the septimal meantone mapping of 7 ([[Talk:Meantone#Unlisted(?) strong 7-limit Meantone extension (maybe related to Catasyc or Laruquadbiyoti?)|per Lucius]]), so I don't believe it's worth adding 19 & 50 to the meanpop extensions. I think keeping 19 & 31 and 50 & 31 makes sense though.
+:::::: That's something to consider (and indeed none of these is deserving of canonicity compared to the others), though as I said, 19 & 50 doesn't really work with the septimal meantone mapping of 7 ([[Talk:Meantone#Unlisted(?) strong 7-limit Meantone extension (maybe related to Catasyc or Laruquadbiyoti?)|per Lucius]]), so I don't believe it's worth adding 19 & 50 to the meanpop extensions. I think keeping 19 & 31 and 50 & 31 makes sense though.
 :::::: > > meanenneadecal vs vincenzo
-:::::: I suppose I'll concede to that, though I'd still rather the 11-limit temperament be called "vincenzo" than "meanenneadecal".
+:::::: I suppose I'll concede to keeping both extensions in the 13-limit (though idk what the details of what either are in the 19-limit), though I'd still rather the 11-limit temperament be called "vincenzo" than "meanenneadecal".
 :::::: > dominant
 :::::: Fine with that proposal. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 16:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)