Talk:16edo: Difference between revisions
→Assumption of tuning theory: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Why* exactly is tuning theory assumed? This is the problem that Domin was complaining about, that people talk too much about tuning specificities and less about composition theory. I want to make steps towards fixing that by not considering "tuning theory" the default form of theory. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 02:10, 13 May 2025 (UTC) | *Why* exactly is tuning theory assumed? This is the problem that Domin was complaining about, that people talk too much about tuning specificities and less about composition theory. I want to make steps towards fixing that by not considering "tuning theory" the default form of theory. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 02:10, 13 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
: The theory section should just give a general overview of the structure, which is what it does. If you think the section needs to be less formal then try to improve it instead of giving it a different title. | |||
: Sidenote: "composition theory" is not really a thing, better call it "practical approaches" or something. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC) | |||