Talk:Diaschismic: Difference between revisions

Line 3:

: And nomenclature is ''particularly'' thorny for this temperament because it de-facto has ''two'' canonical extensions, srutal (34d&46) and diaschismic (46&58), given that it's referred to by both names in the 5-limit. I'd personally vote for renaming the 5-limit temperament simply to "diaschismic", but it makes the canonicity of the 46&58 extension especially dubious. I think it might be best to transfer over the material from my page concerning septimal diaschismic that I can, while repurposing the rest of that page for general discussion about diaschismic extensions. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 19:45, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

:: 5-limit = diaschismic. It's canonical extension (12 & 46) is diaschismic.

:: Pajara is actually the only other viable extension of diaschismic that I can take seriously. It's not accurate for sure, but it does what it does well.

:: I have not and will never use the term "srutal". 34d&46 is hopeless, just look at the [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/search?badness=dirichlet&subgroup=7&edos=&commas=2048%2F2025 badness ranking].

:: 2.3.5.17 is interesting for sure but I can't say I'm impressed by it in practice. The subgroups doesn't particularly open up many new possibilities.

:: Idk if this is useful lol just ranting now.

:: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 20:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 : And nomenclature is ''particularly'' thorny for this temperament because it de-facto has ''two'' canonical extensions, srutal (34d&46) and diaschismic (46&58), given that it's referred to by both names in the 5-limit. I'd personally vote for renaming the 5-limit temperament simply to "diaschismic", but it makes the canonicity of the 46&58 extension especially dubious. I think it might be best to transfer over the material from my page concerning septimal diaschismic that I can, while repurposing the rest of that page for general discussion about diaschismic extensions. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 19:45, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
+:: 5-limit = diaschismic. It's canonical extension (12 & 46) is diaschismic.
+:: Pajara is actually the only other viable extension of diaschismic that I can take seriously. It's not accurate for sure, but it does what it does well.
+:: I have not and will never use the term "srutal". 34d&46 is hopeless, just look at the [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/search?badness=dirichlet&subgroup=7&edos=&commas=2048%2F2025 badness ranking].
+:: 2.3.5.17 is interesting for sure but I can't say I'm impressed by it in practice. The subgroups doesn't particularly open up many new possibilities.
+:: Idk if this is useful lol just ranting now.
+:: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 20:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)