Talk:The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 18:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
+: There simply isn't a need for any 'new list', zeta does what it does, and if you want to make your own list of 'good edos' you can do so, but just be honest that that is what you are doing.
+: If you forced me to come up with a list I'd probably say 5, 7, 12, 19, 31, 41, 53, should be there for it to make any sense, everything else is a wash (to be honest I'm still kind of surprised by 27 being in the 'main' list.)
+: Secondly, the reasoning you wrote doesn't make sense to me. You go from relative error to absolute error by ''dividing'' by the edo, not multiplying. Zeta does kind of look like a relative error measurent, but it isn't really, so it doesn't work out.
+: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 20:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)