Xenharmonic Wiki:Referendum: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | * YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | ||
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* YES. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 61: | Line 62: | ||
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | * YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | ||
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* YES. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | * YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | ||
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* YES. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 92: | Line 95: | ||
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | * YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | ||
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* Neutral. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 107: | Line 111: | ||
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | * YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | ||
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* Neutral. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 145: | Line 150: | ||
* A. Wiki should be open and peer reviewed and vandalism attempts always can be reverted if needed. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * A. Wiki should be open and peer reviewed and vandalism attempts always can be reverted if needed. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, E. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are A, B, E. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A (see Sintel's reasoning). [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 171: | Line 177: | ||
* A. Experts opinion should be validated by clarity of argumentation, not the expert status. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | * A. Experts opinion should be validated by clarity of argumentation, not the expert status. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A, C, E, G. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are A, C, E, G. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A (see Sintel's reasoning), though not much of us are good enough at maths, so I'd also pick F and G. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 192: | Line 199: | ||
* C. In my opinion it should be limited amount of trusted members of community, who are liked by everyone and uncontroversial people, who can decide who can have and what type of permissions on the wiki, and who don't change often. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | * C. In my opinion it should be limited amount of trusted members of community, who are liked by everyone and uncontroversial people, who can decide who can have and what type of permissions on the wiki, and who don't change often. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)" | ||
* The options I'm okay with are B, C (Sintel's proposal). [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are B, C (Sintel's proposal). [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 213: | Line 221: | ||
* C. In my opinion it should be limited and constant amount of trusted members of community, who are liked by everyone and uncontroversial people, who can decide who can have and what type of permissions on the wiki, and who don't change often. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * C. In my opinion it should be limited and constant amount of trusted members of community, who are liked by everyone and uncontroversial people, who can decide who can have and what type of permissions on the wiki, and who don't change often. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C (Sintel's proposal, except that the incumbent bureaucrat(s) must be given merely as much power as ordinary editors over the appointment decision, and that editors may vote to remove a bureaucrat by 4/5 majority, even a lone one who then becomes a lame duck with limited powers, and hold an urgent election/discussion for replacement). [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are A, B, C (Sintel's proposal, except that the incumbent bureaucrat(s) must be given merely as much power as ordinary editors over the appointment decision, and that editors may vote to remove a bureaucrat by 4/5 majority, even a lone one who then becomes a lame duck with limited powers, and hold an urgent election/discussion for replacement). [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 241: | Line 250: | ||
* F. see sintel's comment. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * F. see sintel's comment. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The option I'm okay with is F: allow locks and unlocks both by any admin as in A (for speed) and by popular vote as in C. In the latter case, editors may also vote on a page-specific moratorium on admin locks. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | * The option I'm okay with is F: allow locks and unlocks both by any admin as in A (for speed) and by popular vote as in C. In the latter case, editors may also vote on a page-specific moratorium on admin locks. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A, C, and D. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC) | |||