Xenharmonic Wiki:Referendum: Difference between revisions
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* ABCD [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * ABCD [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* F. There should be a clear protection policy (analogous to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy Wikipedia's protection policy]). Protection can be done at the discretion of an admin, but the reasoning and duration should be clearly outlined on the talk page. To quote the Wikipedia policy: | |||
:: Applying page protection solely as a preemptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Wikipedia and is generally not allowed. Instead, protection is used when vandalism, disruption, or abuse by multiple users is occurring at a frequency that warrants protection. | |||
: Protection should be used sparingly and mostly as a last resort. Leaving pages protected indefinitely without leaving any path to unprotect them (as is happening now!) is unacceptable on a wiki. [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | |||