User:Moremajorthanmajor/United Kingdom of Musical Instruments: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
|Diminished twelfth | |Diminished twelfth | ||
|} | |} | ||
Major is considered as comparable to Sol as minor is to Fa, but Sol ''superparticularis'' and Sol ''superpartiens'' never saw as widespread usage as Fa ''superparticularis'' and Fa ''superpartiens'' before the conversion of the latter to flats. At that time, it was also widespread, but not absolute, that only the true relations, and thus the 2.3.5.7.13.17.19.43 subgroup, were considered within the bounds of the modal system. The paradox of this is that the true relations generally do not have the same desired (sub)harmonics for ''fortis'' and ''lenis''. To solve this problem, theorists quickly created the [[User:Moremajorthanmajor/United Kingdom of Musical Instruments/List of m/n comma mean tetrachords|mean tetrachord]], which is primarily considered to temper out [[129/128]]. | Major is considered as comparable to Sol as minor is to Fa, but Sol ''superparticularis'' and Sol ''superpartiens'' never saw as widespread usage as Fa ''superparticularis'' and Fa ''superpartiens'' before the conversion of the latter to flats. At that time, it was also widespread, but not absolute, that only the true relations, at least for the first three steps from the octave on the chain of fifths, and thus the 2.3.(5).7.(13).(17).19.43 subgroup, were considered within the bounds of the modal system. The paradox of this is that the true relations generally do not have the same desired (sub)harmonics for ''fortis'' and ''lenis''. To solve this problem, theorists quickly created the [[User:Moremajorthanmajor/United Kingdom of Musical Instruments/List of m/n-comma mean tetrachords|mean tetrachord]], which is primarily considered to temper out [[129/128]]. | ||