Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
→Too many short interval pages to fit in "todo:expand" or "stubs": Said thanks and agreed with reply, said what the plan would be next if others also agree with option A |
Explanation of stub removal from very large EDOs |
||
| Line 428: | Line 428: | ||
:: Thank you again for your help :) And Happy Holidays as well :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | :: Thank you again for your help :) And Happy Holidays as well :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: I am posting this update for a general audience rather than for Fredg999 specifically: While not strictly part of this same topic, I removed stub boxes from EDO pages bigger than 1000 for the same reasons that were discussed here: ("''In general, stuff like stub and todo templates should be placed while taking into consideration the importance of the page, so it's expected that narrower topics have shorter pages, including very specific intervals with fewer applications; those can be expanded at any time, of course, but we don't necessarily need a flashing light pointing to them''"). | |||
::: If it happens that any of the specific edo pages I removed stub from actually is important to a bunch of other pages, then of course anyone can feel free to add the stub box back to those specific ones. I just suspect that for more of them than not, they probably didn’t need the stub box, considering their step size is way way below the just noticeable difference and some were even marked as novelties. | |||
::: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 19:15, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||