Syntonic–diatonic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions

ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''syntonic-diatonic equivalence continuum''' is a [[equivalence continuum|continuum]] of [[regular temperament|temperaments]] which equate a number of [[81/80|syntonic commas (81/80)]] with the [[256/243|limma (256/243)]]. This continuum is theoretically interesting in that these are all [[5-limit]] temperaments [[support]]ed by [[5edo]].  
The '''syntonic–diatonic equivalence continuum''' is a [[equivalence continuum|continuum]] of [[regular temperament|temperaments]] which equate a number of [[81/80|syntonic commas (81/80)]] with the [[256/243|Pythagorean limma (256/243)]]. This continuum is theoretically interesting in that these are all [[5-limit]] temperaments [[support]]ed by [[5edo]].  


All temperaments in the continuum satisfy {{nowrap|(81/80)<sup>''n''</sup> ~ 256/243}}. Varying ''n'' results in different temperaments listed in the table below. It converges to [[meantone]] as ''n'' approaches infinity. If we allow non-integer and infinite ''n'', the continuum describes the set of all 5-limit temperaments supported by 5edo due to it being the unique equal temperament that [[tempering out|tempers out]] both commas and thus tempers out all combinations of them. The just value of ''n'' is 4.1952…, and temperaments near this tend to be the most accurate ones.  
All temperaments in the continuum satisfy {{nowrap|(81/80)<sup>''n''</sup> ~ 256/243}}. Varying ''n'' results in different temperaments listed in the table below. It converges to [[meantone]] as ''n'' approaches infinity. If we allow non-integer and infinite ''n'', the continuum describes the set of all 5-limit temperaments supported by 5edo due to it being the unique equal temperament that [[tempering out|tempers out]] both commas and thus tempers out all combinations of them. The just value of ''n'' is 4.1952…, and temperaments near this tend to be the most accurate ones.  
Line 12: Line 12:


If we let {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} ''n'' + 1}} so that {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 0}} means {{nowrap|''n'' {{=}} &minus;1}}, {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 1}} means {{nowrap|''n'' {{=}} 0}}, etc. then the continuum corresponds to {{nowrap|(81/80)<sup>''k''</sup> {{=}} 16/15}}. Some prefer this way of conceptualising it because:
If we let {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} ''n'' + 1}} so that {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 0}} means {{nowrap|''n'' {{=}} &minus;1}}, {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 1}} means {{nowrap|''n'' {{=}} 0}}, etc. then the continuum corresponds to {{nowrap|(81/80)<sup>''k''</sup> {{=}} 16/15}}. Some prefer this way of conceptualising it because:
* 16/15 is the classic diatonic semitone, notable in the 5-limit as the difference between 4/3 and 5/4, so this shifted continuum could also logically be termed the "syntonic-diatonic equivalence continuum". This means that at {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 0}}, 4/3 and 5/4 are mapped to the same interval while 81/80 becomes independent of 16/15 (meaning 81/80 may or may not be tempered) because the relation becomes {{nowrap|(81/80)<sup>0</sup> ~ 1/1 ~ 16/15}}.
* 16/15 is the classic diatonic semitone, notable in the 5-limit as the difference between 4/3 and 5/4, so this shifted continuum could also logically be termed the "syntonic–diatonic equivalence continuum". This means that at {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 0}}, 4/3 and 5/4 are mapped to the same interval while 81/80 becomes independent of 16/15 (meaning 81/80 may or may not be tempered) because the relation becomes {{nowrap|(81/80)<sup>0</sup> ~ 1/1 ~ 16/15}}.
* {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 1}} and upwards (up to a point) represent temperaments with (the potential for) reasonably good accuracy as equating at least one 81/80 with 16/15 seems like a good lower bound for a temperament intended to model JI. A good upper bound might be rodan {{nowrap|(''k'' {{=}} 4)}}, with the only exception being meantone {{nowrap|(''n'' {{=}} ''k'' {{=}} &infin;)}}. (Temperaments corresponding to {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 0, &minus;1, &minus;2...}} are comparatively low-accuracy to the point of developing various intriguing structures and consequences.)
* {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 1}} and upwards (up to a point) represent temperaments with (the potential for) reasonably good accuracy as equating at least one 81/80 with 16/15 seems like a good lower bound for a temperament intended to model JI. A good upper bound might be rodan {{nowrap|(''k'' {{=}} 4)}}, with the only exception being meantone {{nowrap|(''n'' {{=}} ''k'' {{=}} &infin;)}}. (Temperaments corresponding to {{nowrap|''k'' {{=}} 0, &minus;1, &minus;2...}} are comparatively low-accuracy to the point of developing various intriguing structures and consequences.)
* 16/15 is the simplest ratio to be tempered in the continuum.  
* 16/15 is the simplest ratio to be tempered in the continuum.