Talk:299/289: Difference between revisions
Commented on the category |
m discussion answer |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If you really don’t want a commas-by-name category, I won’t add one. I just wanted to voice why I think it is relevant and helps certain types of readers (myself included) navigate the wiki more easily. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 22:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | If you really don’t want a commas-by-name category, I won’t add one. I just wanted to voice why I think it is relevant and helps certain types of readers (myself included) navigate the wiki more easily. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 22:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
:The problem is I named this comma "unidecimisma" because I was under wrong impression that it's the first useful comma appearing in sequence after 11th harmonic, only because I initially checked too little prime factors before I concluded that. But even in 23-limit there's also 253/247 which is better for this, and none of them should be called "unidecismisma". I don't know how to call this comma really, if it will be called, 253/247 should have name too.--[[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 23:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||