User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio: Difference between revisions

Line 29:

::::::: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

:::::::: Regarding the lack of 9/7 and 14/9 on the chart, that is because those intervals are too close to 32/25 and 25/16 respectively, though to be a bit more helpful in this respect, 9/7 is actually on the sharp side of 32/25, while 14/9 is correspondingly on the flat side of 25/16.

:::::::: Regarding the lack of 9/7 and 14/9 on the chart, that is because those intervals are too close to 32/25 and 25/16 respectively, though to be a bit more helpful in this respect, 9/7 is actually on the sharp side of 32/25, while 14/9 is correspondingly on the flat side of 25/16. I should also mention that 7/6 and 8/7 are paired together in this chart as forth inversions of each other, since the 7-limit seems to want to work as a division of either the fourth or the tritave rather than as a normal division of the fifth.

:::::::: For me, the 22edo fifth definitely passes as different to my ears- specifically, it registers as something akin to 128/85.

:::::::: Regarding the last section, the motions indicated are not meant to reflect the direction of resolution, rather they simply indicate possible changes, and I have yet to add all of the possible transformations. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

:::::::: Regarding the last section, the motions indicated are not meant to reflect the direction of resolution, rather they simply indicate possible changes, and I have yet to add all of the possible transformations. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ::::::: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
-:::::::: Regarding the lack of 9/7 and 14/9 on the chart, that is because those intervals are too close to 32/25 and 25/16 respectively, though to be a bit more helpful in this respect, 9/7 is actually on the sharp side of 32/25, while 14/9 is correspondingly on the flat side of 25/16.
+:::::::: Regarding the lack of 9/7 and 14/9 on the chart, that is because those intervals are too close to 32/25 and 25/16 respectively, though to be a bit more helpful in this respect, 9/7 is actually on the sharp side of 32/25, while 14/9 is correspondingly on the flat side of 25/16.  I should also mention that 7/6 and 8/7 are paired together in this chart as forth inversions of each other, since the 7-limit seems to want to work as a division of either the fourth or the tritave rather than as a normal division of the fifth.
 :::::::: For me, the 22edo fifth definitely passes as different to my ears- specifically, it registers as something akin to 128/85.
-:::::::: Regarding the last section, the motions indicated are not meant to reflect the direction of resolution, rather they simply indicate possible changes, and I have yet to add all of the possible transformations. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
+:::::::: Regarding the last section, the motions indicated are not meant to reflect the direction of resolution, rather they simply indicate possible changes, and I have yet to add all of the possible transformations. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)