The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Difference between revisions
m →Strict zeta edos: note 72 and 954 |
m →Strict zeta edos: typo |
||
| Line 300: | Line 300: | ||
We may define the '''strict zeta edos''' to be the edos that are in all four of the above lists. The list of strict zeta edos begins {{EDOs| 2, 5, 7, 12, 19, 31, 53, 270, 1395, 1578, 8539, 14348, 58973, }} …. | We may define the '''strict zeta edos''' to be the edos that are in all four of the above lists. The list of strict zeta edos begins {{EDOs| 2, 5, 7, 12, 19, 31, 53, 270, 1395, 1578, 8539, 14348, 58973, }} …. | ||
It's debatable whether the constraint on pure octaves is a good idea, as it could be interpreted as allowing for accounting for tuning tendency sharpward or flatward, in which case the two smallest additional edos strict zeta edos are [[72edo]] and [[954edo]]. | It's debatable whether the constraint on pure octaves is a good idea, as it could be interpreted as allowing for accounting for tuning tendency sharpward or flatward, in which case the two smallest additional edos that are strict zeta edos are [[72edo]] and [[954edo]]. | ||
=== Anti-record edos === | === Anti-record edos === | ||