S-expression: Difference between revisions
m →Sk (square-particulars): section for clarity/coherency + more readable (larger) formula + fix link to semiparticulars |
m →Sk/S(k + 2) (semiparticulars): convert to much more readable LaTeX |
||
| Line 889: | Line 889: | ||
== Sk/S(k + 2) (semiparticulars) == | == Sk/S(k + 2) (semiparticulars) == | ||
For differences between square-particulars of the form S(''k'' | For differences between square-particulars of the form S(''k'' - 1)/S(''k'' + 1) the resulting comma is either [[superparticular]] or [[#Glossary|odd-particular]]. (This terminology also suggests [[#Glossary|throdd-particular]] and [[#Glossary|quodd-particular]] as generalizations.) | ||
Tempering S(''k'' - 1)/S(''k'' + | Tempering S(''k'' - 1)/S(''k'' + 1) implies that (''k'' + 2)/(''k'' - 2) is divisible exactly into two halves of (''k'' + 1)/(''k'' - 1). It also implies that the intervals (''k'' + 2)/''k'' (=s) and ''k''/(''k'' - 2) (=L) are equidistant from (''k'' + 1)/(''k'' - 1) (=M) because to make them equidistant we need to temper: | ||
<math> | |||
\LARGE \frac{L/M}{M/s} = \frac{ \left(\frac{k}{k-2}\right)/\left(\frac{k+1}{k-1}\right) }{ \left(\frac{k+1}{k-1}\right)/\left(\frac{k+2}{k}\right) } = \frac{Ls}{m^2} = \frac{\frac{k+2}{k-2}}{\left(\frac{k+1}{k-1}\right)^2} | |||
= ( | </math> | ||
= | |||
...and notice that the latter expression is the one we've [[#Mathematical derivation|shown is equal to S(''k''-1)/S(''k''+1)]]. In other words, you could interpret that a reason that tempering S(''k''-1)/S(''k''+1) results in (''k''+1)/(''k''-1) being half of (''k''+2)/(''k''-2) is because it makes the following three intervals equidistant: | ...and notice that the latter expression is the one we've [[#Mathematical derivation|shown is equal to S(''k''-1)/S(''k''+1)]]. In other words, you could interpret that a reason that tempering S(''k''-1)/S(''k''+1) results in (''k''+1)/(''k''-1) being half of (''k''+2)/(''k''-2) is because it makes the following three intervals equidistant: | ||