The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Difference between revisions
m →Non-record edos: Fix math. 79 and 80 can't both be better than both their adjacent edos and 80 is clearly superior. 1-4 are zeta peaks, so making them also indecisive makes no sense. |
|||
| Line 309: | Line 309: | ||
Edos with a higher zeta peak than the edos on either side of them. A helpful list for finding edos that approximate primes well in size ranges that lack any record-holding zeta edos (e.g. between 60 and 70 tones). | Edos with a higher zeta peak than the edos on either side of them. A helpful list for finding edos that approximate primes well in size ranges that lack any record-holding zeta edos (e.g. between 60 and 70 tones). | ||
{{EDOs|5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 27, 29, 31, 34, 36, 38, 41, 43, 46, 48, 50, 53, 56, 58, 60, 63, 65, 68, 72, 75, 77 | {{EDOs|5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 27, 29, 31, 34, 36, 38, 41, 43, 46, 48, 50, 53, 56, 58, 60, 63, 65, 68, 72, 75, 77, 80, 82, 84, 87, 89, 91, 94, 96, 99}}… | ||
| Line 323: | Line 323: | ||
Edos which are neither local zeta edos, nor anti-zeta edos. Helpful for finding edos that are more restrictive than local zeta edos, but not as far off the deep end as anti-zeta edos. They might narrow down the range of compositional choices available so as to be not so much to promote indecision, but not so few as to promote frustration. | Edos which are neither local zeta edos, nor anti-zeta edos. Helpful for finding edos that are more restrictive than local zeta edos, but not as far off the deep end as anti-zeta edos. They might narrow down the range of compositional choices available so as to be not so much to promote indecision, but not so few as to promote frustration. | ||
{{EDOs| | {{EDOs| 9, 14, 21, 26, 32, 39, 45, 51, 62, 67, 70, 74, 85, 93, 98}}… | ||