Neutral and interordinal intervals in MOS scales: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 131: Line 131:
Let n and k be integers, and let x be a real number such that kx is not an integer. Then floor((n + k)x) − floor(nx) ≥ floor(kx).
Let n and k be integers, and let x be a real number such that kx is not an integer. Then floor((n + k)x) − floor(nx) ≥ floor(kx).
==== Proof ====
==== Proof ====
floor((n + k)x) − floor(nx) = −1 + ceil((n + k)x) + ceil(−nx) ≥ ceil((n + k)x − nx) − 1 = ceil(kx) − 1 = floor(kx).
floor((n + k)x) − floor(nx) = −1 + ceil((n + k)x) + ceil(−nx) ≥ ceil((n + k)x − nx) − 1 = ceil(kx) − 1 = floor(kx). {{qed}}


=== Discretizing Lemma ===
=== Discretizing Lemma ===
Consider an m-note [[maximal evenness|maximally even]] mos of an n-equal division, and let 1 ≤ k ≤ m − 1. Then a k-step of that mos is either floor(nk/m)\n or ceil(nk/m)\n.
Consider an m-note [[maximal evenness|maximally even]] mos of an n-equal division, and let 1 ≤ k ≤ m − 1. Then a k-step of that mos is either floor(nk/m)\n or ceil(nk/m)\n.
==== Proof ====
==== Proof ====
The circular word formed by stacking k-steps of the mos is itself a maximally even mos, considered as a subset of a kn-note equal tuning. One step of an m'-note maximally even mos of an n'-note equal tuning is either floor(n'/m')\n'{{angbr|E}} or ceil(n'/m')\n'{{angbr|E}}, implying the lemma.
The circular word formed by stacking k-steps of the mos is itself a maximally even mos, considered as a subset of a kn-note equal tuning. One step of an m'-note maximally even mos of an n'-note equal tuning is either floor(n'/m')\n'{{angbr|E}} or ceil(n'/m')\n'{{angbr|E}}, implying the lemma. {{qed}}


=== Proof of Theorem ===
=== Proof of Theorem ===