Talk:136/135: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 22:50, 25 January 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 2,289 edits m →Slight/mild rename proposal ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:53, 25 January 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 2,289 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Kind regards, --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 22:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)		Kind regards, --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 22:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

	: Small addendum: To give examples of "diatonic" (as a rank-3 2.3.5.17 subgroup temperament) being problematic, I want to draw attention to the emergent naming of lower-rank temperaments based on combinations of higher-rank temperaments that they combine; in such a discussion it may be confusing whether it is meant merely that the user finds the temperaments to have a "diatonic quality" or whether they support "diatonic"· --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 22:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)		: Small addendum: To give examples of "diatonic" (as a rank-3 2.3.5.17 subgroup temperament) being problematic, I want to draw attention to the emergent naming of lower-rank temperaments based on combinations of higher-rank temperaments that they combine; in such a discussion it may be confusing whether it is meant merely that the user finds the temperaments to have a "diatonic quality" or whether they support "diatonic"· An example is [[80edo]] may be described as "[[parapyth]] [[octopus]]"/"[[octopus]] [[parapyth]]" (whichever flows better, although it might be nice to have some way of standardising the order). --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 22:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)