Talk:Slendroschisma: Difference between revisions
CompactStar (talk | contribs) Created page with "== Name == This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of slendric when it is not. Similar to 256/255, I think clarifications like "not to be con..." |
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Name == | == Name == | ||
This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of [[slendric]] when it is not. Similar to [[256/255]], I think clarifications like "not to be confused with slendric comma (1029/1024, 8.43¢) or slendro diesis (49/48, 35.7¢)" should not be not needed. It is even worse than with the 256/255 situation here, since the temperament of this comma has been already named, and because there are already are 2 [[slendro]]-related interval names to begin with (slendric comma and slendro diesis). This name is derived from "slendric schisma", so I would suggest something like slendrischisma, similar to the [[garischisma]], that would be different enough for it to be understood to not be a slendro comma. | This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of [[slendric]] when it is not. Similar to [[256/255]], I think clarifications like "not to be confused with slendric comma (1029/1024, 8.43¢) or slendro diesis (49/48, 35.7¢)" should not be not needed. It is even worse than with the 256/255 situation here, since the temperament of this comma has been already named "slendrismic" now, and because there are already are 2 [[slendro]]-related interval names to begin with (slendric comma and slendro diesis). This name is derived from "slendric schisma", so I would suggest something like slendrischisma, similar to the [[garischisma]], that would be different enough for it to be understood to not be a slendro comma. | ||
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC) | [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:42, 2 January 2024
Name
This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of slendric when it is not. Similar to 256/255, I think clarifications like "not to be confused with slendric comma (1029/1024, 8.43¢) or slendro diesis (49/48, 35.7¢)" should not be not needed. It is even worse than with the 256/255 situation here, since the temperament of this comma has been already named "slendrismic" now, and because there are already are 2 slendro-related interval names to begin with (slendric comma and slendro diesis). This name is derived from "slendric schisma", so I would suggest something like slendrischisma, similar to the garischisma, that would be different enough for it to be understood to not be a slendro comma. CompactStar (talk) 01:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)