Andrew Heathwaite's MOS Investigations: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>Andrew_Heathwaite **Imported revision 270457072 - Original comment: ** |
Wikispaces>Andrew_Heathwaite **Imported revision 270653882 - Original comment: ** |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | ||
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | ||
: This revision was by author [[User:Andrew_Heathwaite|Andrew_Heathwaite]] and made on <tt>2011- | : This revision was by author [[User:Andrew_Heathwaite|Andrew_Heathwaite]] and made on <tt>2011-11-01 11:22:56 UTC</tt>.<br> | ||
: The original revision id was <tt> | : The original revision id was <tt>270653882</tt>.<br> | ||
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | ||
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | ||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
**3 2 5 3 3 3 3 .. -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9** | **3 2 5 3 3 3 3 .. -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9** | ||
Update: Mike Battaglia has made a dedicated page for explaining these modes -- yay! -- see [[Porcupine Temperament Modal Harmony]]. | |||
=Orwell[9], meet Porcupine[7]= | |||
I've done a little composing in Orwell[9], which, in 22edo, goes 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 (where L=3\22 and s=2\22), so I want to apply MODMOS to that. To make a MODMOS here, we alter a tone by a single degree of 22edo, same as we do in Porcupine[7]. This is our "chroma," and it's generated by taking L-s: so in 22edo we have 3\22-2\22=1\22. We wind up with either: | |||
# A permutation of the four large and five small steps, eg. 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 | |||
## How many of these are there? Does anyone know a formula for finding the number of possible permutations when some of the items are interchangable? Here the question is, how many permutations can we make of 4 items of Type A and 5 items of Type B? | |||
# A scale with three step sizes: large, small, and smaller, eg. 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 1 | |||
## In 22edo, our "smaller" step is the same as our "chroma" (which is the interval that we alter a tone by to produce a MODMOS, L-s). However, this is not the case in larger edos! Look at [[31edo]], where our initial scale is 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3. Now our chroma is 4\31-3\31=1\31 and our "smaller" step is 2\31: 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 2! We get our "smaller" step by starting with s (3\31) and taking away a chroma (1\31), so we have 3\31-1\31=2\31. | |||
## So what should we call the "smaller" interval in our scale? Maybe some kind of diminished something-or-another? | |||
# A scale with four steps sizes: large, small, larger and smaller, eg. 4 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 | |||
## This is generated by starting with L and adding a chroma, so in 22edo it's 3\22+1\22=4\22. In 31edo, that would be 4\31+1\31=5\31, and the scale in question would be 5 2 4 3 4 3 4 3 3. | |||
## So what should we call the "larger" step? Some kind of augmented something-or-another? | |||
## Note that in 22edo, our "larger" step, 4\22, is the same as two of our small steps (2\22+2\22=4\22), even though we generated our "larger" step by adding a chroma to a large step (3\22+1\22). In 31edo, our "larger" step is NOT the same as two of our small steps (4\31+1\31=5\31 does not equal 3\31+3\31=6\31)! | |||
So we can take advantage of the fact that two small steps in 22edo's Orwell[9] (2\22) make one "larger" step (4\22). If 9 tones is a few too many, we can turn some 2+2's into 4's. So for instance, the first example above goes: | |||
3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 | |||
3 3 4 3 2 3 4. | |||
But check it out! 3 3 4 3 2 3 4 is a MODMOS of Porcupine[7]! Here's how we can get it by chromatically-altering Porcupine[7] one tone at a time: | |||
3 3 3 3 3 3 4 | |||
3 3 4 2 3 3 4 | |||
3 3 4 3 2 3 4 | |||
And we see, not surprisingly, that this doesn't work the same way in 31edo. | |||
Start with a MODMOS of Orwell[9]: 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 | |||
Combine small steps: 4 4 6 4 3 4 6 | |||
4 4 4 4 4 4 7 is as close as we can get to Porcupine[7], and it sure ain't the same. Our chroma (L-s) is 3\31, really different! | |||
4 4 7 1 4 4 7 | |||
4 4 7 1 4 1 7 | |||
Not even close!</pre></div> | |||
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4> | <h4>Original HTML content:</h4> | ||
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"><html><head><title>Andrew Heathwaite's MOS Investigations</title></head><body>Ok, this is a page for me, Andrew Heathwaite, to organize my thoughts and questions regarding <a class="wiki_link" href="/MOSScales">Moment of Symmetry Scales</a>.<br /> | <div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"><html><head><title>Andrew Heathwaite's MOS Investigations</title></head><body>Ok, this is a page for me, Andrew Heathwaite, to organize my thoughts and questions regarding <a class="wiki_link" href="/MOSScales">Moment of Symmetry Scales</a>.<br /> | ||
| Line 253: | Line 288: | ||
<strong>3 2 5 3 3 3 3 .. -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9</strong><br /> | <strong>3 2 5 3 3 3 3 .. -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9</strong><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Update: Mike Battaglia has made a dedicated page for explaining these modes -- yay! -- see <a class="wiki_link" href="/Porcupine%20Temperament%20Modal%20Harmony">Porcupine Temperament Modal Harmony</a>.<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:8:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc4"><a name="Orwell[9], meet Porcupine[7]"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:8 -->Orwell[9], meet Porcupine[7]</h1> | |||
<br /> | |||
I've done a little composing in Orwell[9], which, in 22edo, goes 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 (where L=3\22 and s=2\22), so I want to apply MODMOS to that. To make a MODMOS here, we alter a tone by a single degree of 22edo, same as we do in Porcupine[7]. This is our &quot;chroma,&quot; and it's generated by taking L-s: so in 22edo we have 3\22-2\22=1\22. We wind up with either:<br /> | |||
<ol><li>A permutation of the four large and five small steps, eg. 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2<ol><li>How many of these are there? Does anyone know a formula for finding the number of possible permutations when some of the items are interchangable? Here the question is, how many permutations can we make of 4 items of Type A and 5 items of Type B?</li></ol></li><li>A scale with three step sizes: large, small, and smaller, eg. 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 1<ol><li>In 22edo, our &quot;smaller&quot; step is the same as our &quot;chroma&quot; (which is the interval that we alter a tone by to produce a MODMOS, L-s). However, this is not the case in larger edos! Look at <a class="wiki_link" href="/31edo">31edo</a>, where our initial scale is 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3. Now our chroma is 4\31-3\31=1\31 and our &quot;smaller&quot; step is 2\31: 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 2! We get our &quot;smaller&quot; step by starting with s (3\31) and taking away a chroma (1\31), so we have 3\31-1\31=2\31.</li><li>So what should we call the &quot;smaller&quot; interval in our scale? Maybe some kind of diminished something-or-another?</li></ol></li><li>A scale with four steps sizes: large, small, larger and smaller, eg. 4 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 2<ol><li>This is generated by starting with L and adding a chroma, so in 22edo it's 3\22+1\22=4\22. In 31edo, that would be 4\31+1\31=5\31, and the scale in question would be 5 2 4 3 4 3 4 3 3.</li><li>So what should we call the &quot;larger&quot; step? Some kind of augmented something-or-another?</li><li>Note that in 22edo, our &quot;larger&quot; step, 4\22, is the same as two of our small steps (2\22+2\22=4\22), even though we generated our &quot;larger&quot; step by adding a chroma to a large step (3\22+1\22). In 31edo, our &quot;larger&quot; step is NOT the same as two of our small steps (4\31+1\31=5\31 does not equal 3\31+3\31=6\31)!</li></ol></li></ol><br /> | |||
So we can take advantage of the fact that two small steps in 22edo's Orwell[9] (2\22) make one &quot;larger&quot; step (4\22). If 9 tones is a few too many, we can turn some 2+2's into 4's. So for instance, the first example above goes:<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 <br /> | |||
3 3 4 3 2 3 4.<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
But check it out! 3 3 4 3 2 3 4 is a MODMOS of Porcupine[7]! Here's how we can get it by chromatically-altering Porcupine[7] one tone at a time:<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
3 3 3 3 3 3 4<br /> | |||
3 3 4 2 3 3 4<br /> | |||
3 3 4 3 2 3 4<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
And we see, not surprisingly, that this doesn't work the same way in 31edo.<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
Start with a MODMOS of Orwell[9]: 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3<br /> | |||
Combine small steps: 4 4 6 4 3 4 6<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
4 4 4 4 4 4 7 is as close as we can get to Porcupine[7], and it sure ain't the same. Our chroma (L-s) is 3\31, really different!<br /> | |||
4 4 7 1 4 4 7<br /> | |||
4 4 7 1 4 1 7<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
Not even close!</body></html></pre></div> | |||