Mercator family: Difference between revisions
→Iodine: added more info |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~5/4 = 386.264 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~5/4 = 386.264 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 477, 530, 583, 636, 689, 742, 795, 848, 901, 1749, 2650 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.284323 | [[Badness]]: 0.284323 | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~225/224 = 5.3666 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~225/224 = 5.3666 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 159, 212, 689c, 901cc }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.087022 | [[Badness]]: 0.087022 | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~225/224 = 6.1204 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~225/224 = 6.1204 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 106d, 159, 212, 371d, 583cde }} | ||
Badness: 0.054452 | Badness: 0.054452 | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~225/224 = 6.1430 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~225/224 = 6.1430 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 106d, 159, 212, 371df, 583cdeff }} | ||
Badness: 0.029980 | Badness: 0.029980 | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~385/384 = 4.1494 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~385/384 = 4.1494 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 159e, 212e, 265, 318, 583c }} | ||
Badness: 0.115066 | Badness: 0.115066 | ||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~385/384 = 3.9850 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~385/384 = 3.9850 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 159ef, 212ef, 265, 318, 583cf }} | ||
Badness: 0.061158 | Badness: 0.061158 | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~225/224 = 6.3976 or ~441/440 = 4.9232 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~225/224 = 6.3976 or ~441/440 = 4.9232 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 106, 212 }} | ||
Badness: 0.109648 | Badness: 0.109648 | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~176/175 = 8.8283 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~176/175 = 8.8283 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 106, 159d }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.063254 | [[Badness]]: 0.063254 | ||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~176/175 = 8.1254 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~176/175 = 8.1254 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 53, 106, 159d }} | ||
Badness: 0.036988 | Badness: 0.036988 | ||
| Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~6075/3584 = 913.7347 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~6075/3584 = 913.7347 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 159, 424cd, 583, 742, 2385d, 3127d }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.477 | [[Badness]]: 0.477 | ||
| Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~6075/3584 = 913.7322 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~6075/3584 = 913.7322 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 159, 424cd, 583, 742, 2385d, 3127d }} | ||
Badness: 0.0875 | Badness: 0.0875 | ||
| Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~441/260 = 913.7115 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~441/260 = 913.7115 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 159, 424cdff, 583f, 742, 1643 }} | ||
Badness: 0.0476 | Badness: 0.0476 | ||
| Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~441/260 = 913.7131 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~441/260 = 913.7131 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 159, 583f, 742 }} | ||
Badness: 0.0328 | Badness: 0.0328 | ||